Israel Military Forum

Welcome to the Israel Military Forum. You are currently viewing our Israel Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, Image Forum and access our other features. By joining our Israel Military Forum you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so
Join Our Israel Community Today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go Back   Israel Military Forum > Social > World News > Europe
Register FAQ Pictures Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Europe News from the European continent.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2010, 02:09 PM
Paparock's Avatar
Paparock Paparock is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southern California High Desert Mountains
Posts: 48,313
Paparock is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Mainstream Islamic organisations 'share al-Qaeda ideology'

Mainstream Islamic organisations 'share al-Qaeda ideology'

The report, sent to the government’s Office for Security and Counter Terrorism (OSCT), was not intended for publication but has now been leaked on the internet.

Entitled "Preventing terrorism, where next for Britain?" it says the ideology of non-violent Islamists is “broadly the same as that of violent Islamists” adding “they disagree only on tactics.”

It produces a list of those it believes are “non-violent Islamists” and adds: "These are a selection of the various groups and institutions active in the UK which are broadly sympathetic to Islamism.

“Whilst only a small proportion will agree with al-Qaeda's tactics, many will agree with their overall goal of creating a single 'Islamic state' which would bring together all Muslims around the world under a single government and then impose on them a single interpretation of sharia as state law."

The document adds that if the government engages with such groups "it risks empowering proponents of the ideology, if not the methodology, that is behind terrorism."

Quilliam argues that the government needs to move beyond tackling those who advocate violent extremism to target those that espouse similar but non-violent views.

Their views are thought to hold sway as the Coalition conducts a major review of the government’s Prevent counter-terrorism strategy.

A Home Office spokesman said the report had not been solicited but added: "We believe the Prevent programme isn't working as effectively as it could and want a strategy that is effective and properly focused – that is why we are reviewing it."

The list sent to the OSCT includes a unit within Scotland Yard called the Muslim Contact Unit and another independent group designed to improve the relationship between the police and the Muslim community called the Muslim Safety Forum.

It also includes the Muslim Council of Britain, one of the main groups representing Muslims in Britain, and its rival the Muslim Association of Britain.

Other groups on the list are the Islamic Human Rights Commission, the Federation of Student Islamic Societies and the Cordoba Foundation.
Quilliam also singles out the Islam Channel, a satellite TV channel which has been the subject of one of their reports.

Among the mosques identified are Finsbury Park mosque in North London, formerly run by the extremist preacher Abu Hamza but now under new management, along with East London Mosque and Birmingham Central mosque.

Politicians described as "Islamist backed" include Salma Yaqoob, leader of the Respect Party, and the former Respect MP George Galloway.

Inayat Bunglawala, chairman of Muslims4Uk and a former spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, claimed the list was “like something straight out of a Stasi manual” referring to the former East German secret police.

He added: “In effect, Quilliam – a body funded very generously by the government through Prevent – are attempting to set themselves up as arbiters of who is and is not an acceptable Muslim.

“Their document specifically contains a McCarthy-type list of large and established Muslim organisations that they regard as suspect and smears them as being 'Islamists'."

The Metropolitan Police said they were proud of the Muslim Contact Unit which had “carried out ground-breaking work and raised understanding within the counter-terrorism community of the issues facing Muslim communities.”

A spokesman added: “The unit's work involves regular meetings with a wide range of individuals and groups to provide advice and guidance, to hear their concerns and to provide a channel by which these can then be communicated to other sections of the Metropolitan Police.”

Maajid Nawaz co-director of Quilliam told the Daily Telegraph: “Quilliam has a track record of distinguishing between legal tolerance and civil tolerance – we oppose banning non-violent extremists...yet we see no reason why tax payers should subsidise them. It is in this context that we wish to raise awareness around Islamism.”
Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2012, 03:22 PM
Paparock's Avatar
Paparock Paparock is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Southern California High Desert Mountains
Posts: 48,313
Paparock is on a distinguished road
Arrow Aiding and Abetting Islamic Vigilantism in Germany

Aiding and Abetting Islamic Vigilantism in Germany
German lawyer Michael C. Schneider's troubles -- not only with Muslim extremists, but also with the German bar -- have dangerous implications for free societies everywhere
By Andrew E. Harrod

The German lawyer Michael C. Schneider in Frankfurt am Main recently described his rather dangerous personal triangular relationship with his German bar regulators and his Muslim and left-wing enemies at the conservative German website Politically Incorrect (PI). It is an ominous tale with dangerous implications for free societies everywhere.

By way of introduction, Schneider writes that "for many years," he has given lectures and written treatises concerning "five thematic areas" that "particularly concern." These themes are namely that (1) "Christianity is largely destroyed, but a new motivating lead idea for the Occident is until now not in sight"; (2) "the ruling elite venerates the multicultural ideology and specifically imports enemies into Germany"; (3) "in the center of an undirected migration stands the importation of the barbaric, fascist ideology named sharia-Islam"; (4) "corrupt elites interest themselves not for the wellbeing of the people, but rather exclusively for their personal enrichment"; and (5) "bound up with the entry into the EU and the community currency Euro is the complete disappearance of democracy."

The "personal costs" described by Schneider for his public commentary "are enormous: clients take their leave because of fears of association with an 'extremist[,]'" and "anonymous callers from the leftwing-extremist and Islamic scene threaten straightaway with death." Schneider notes in particular that he began in early 2010 to post his writings at websites such as PI. With PI itself receiving 40,000-70,000 readers a day, Schneider's entries have brought him a "modest prominence in the anti-Islamic scene" but "also, on the other hand, some notoriety in the Islamic scene as a hostile caricature [Feindbild] and object of hatred." "Because many authors at PI publish anonymously," Schneider adds, "one takes hold of the few who do not."

Schneider's response to such threats has been to make his office and dwelling "anonymous." Schneider's law chancellery address, for example, now consists merely of an office in which Schneider is available only after an appointment arranged by telephone and clear identification of the visitor via a security camera built into the doorbell system.

Schneider's local bar association, though, has charged him with being in violation of section 27 of the Federal Lawyer Code
(Bundesrechtsanwaltsordnung, or BRAO), which requires the physical maintenance of a chancellery within the bar region where a lawyer practices. As Schneider explains, he supposedly has no "orderly chancellery" because he is "not personally available at any time at the chancellery address."

In response, Schneider has protested that BRAO section 29 allows for a bar organization to make an exception to this chancellery requirement "in the interest of the practice of law or for the avoidance of hardships." "The endangerment of life and limb," Schneider comments, "is without doubt such a hardship." Yet in a response that Schneider is legally appealing, the president of the Frankfurt bar organization has written to Schneider that section 29 is inapplicable because Schneider "provokes" his "situation of endangerment anew over and over again" through his writings. "In other words," summarizes Schneider, "whoever provokes the militant political left and jihadist Islam is themselves guilty if his life comes into danger. He should have simply shut up. Freedom of opinion in the sense of the Basic Law [Grundgesetz, or German constitution] is not desired."

Past writings by me at venues such as the Middle East Forum's Legal Project (see here, for example) have concerned the phenomenon termed lawfare, or the continuation of warfare by legal means by militant Muslims against unfettered discussion of Islam in general and particular Muslim groups. Schneider's case, though, illustrates once again that such Muslims and their leftist allies need not utilize public laws as a means of coercion, but may also resort to private vigilantism. When public authorities, however, abdicate their proper protective functions with an inadequate response to private threats, an outsourcing of lawfare to individuals in effect takes place.

Such public acquiescence in, and therefore aiding and abetting of, private coercion is not without precedent in Islam. As the Egyptian-American apostate from Islam Nonnie Darwish notes in her 2012 book The Devil We Don't Know: The Dark Side of Revolutions in the Middle East (favorably reviewed by me, among others, at, "so-called moderate Muslim countries" use the "trick" of publicly proclaiming respect for human rights while turning a blind eye to the killing of apostates and others under traditional sharia norms by individual Muslims, who have under Islamic law, "in many cases, the right to be judge and executioner." Darwish thus sees "[c]laims that Muslim society is unable to suppress terrorist groups" as "unrealistic and hypocritical" in light of these "little dictators in all ranks of society."

"If Muslim society treated its terrorists the same way it treats apostates," Darwish analyzes, "the world would have no Islamic terrorism problem." "While apostates are never allowed to form organizations or congregate," Darwish elaborates, "terrorists have offices all across the Muslim world and under fictitious names in the West. Something is very with this picture and it does not reflect well on Islam."

Free societies and their authorities such as the bar organization in Frankfurt, whatever their motives and analysis, would do well to consider such facts. Defeating Islamist lawfare requires not only stopping legal sins of commission through the use of statutes to prohibit free speech, but also avoiding sins of omission with respect to lax legal precautions against individual Muslim acts of violence targeting individuals like Schneider, who rightfully refuse to simply keep their mouths shut.

Reply With Quote
Israel Forum

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Israel Military Forum