Welcome to the Israel Military Forum. You are currently viewing our Israel Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, Image Forum and access our other features. By joining our Israel Military Forum you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so
|Register||FAQ||Pictures||Members List||Calendar||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read|
||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
CAIR Battles Free Speech in Michigan
CAIR Battles Free Speech in Michigan
Mich. town caves to CAIR
A law firm that defends and promotes Christian heritage and moral values has filed a lawsuit in response to authorities in a Michigan community stopping a speech that was critical of Islamic sharia law.
On January 26, 2012, Muslim terrorist-turned-Christian Kamal Saleem was addressing an assembly in the auditorium at Allegan High School. The event was an effort to extol the virtues of the U.S. Constitution and "American Laws for American Courts." Saleem discussed the effort by State Rep. David Agema (R) to pass HB 4769, or the "Restriction of Application of Foreign Laws Act," which bans the use of foreign laws in the state.
Erin Mersino is trial counsel at the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC). Despite the fact that no one in the audience protested the speech, she says Allegan police interrupted Saleem's presentation and ordered that the event be shut down.
"They were supposed to be acting as security," Mersino reports. "However, on the day of the event, after the high school received this letter from CAIR saying that they should not allow Kamal Saleem to speak, then all of a sudden the event is shut down."
She contends that the Council on American-Islamic Relations cannot just step in and use its bullying power to silence someone else's free-speech rights.
"They are using their power to step in and say, 'Don't allow this person to speak. They don't have views that are similar to ours, so they must be silenced,'" the attorney argues. "And how did the school district react? To comply with CAIR's wishes."
TMLC's suit is on behalf of the organizers of the event, who have named CAIR, CAIR's Michigan director, the city of Allegan, the Allegan Police Department, and the school district as defendants in the case.
In Florida, public outcry recently ensured that representatives from CAIR and similar groups would no longer be invited to address students in Tampa's public schools. The Florida Family Association has told OneNewsNow the radical organization has vigorously opposed legislation in Congress and a number of states that would prohibit foreign law, like sharia, from being accepted by domestic courts.
Hamas-linked CAIR sued for restricting the freedom of speech
Hamas-linked CAIR sued for restricting the freedom of speech
Two important cases, via Pamela Geller:
Police Shut-down Event Promoting U.S. Constitution. TMLC Files Lawsuit against Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI); Allegan Officials
ANN ARBOR, MI – In the middle of an event to extol the virtues of the U.S. Constitution and “American Laws For American Courts,” the audience learned first-hand how easy it is to lose their freedom of Speech and Assembly. Amid shouts of “What about free speech?” from the audience, the Allegan Police Department ordered the event shut-down. School officials notified police that they had received a letter complaining about the event from Dawud Walid, Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI). The letter asked the school to disallow the event despite an existing contract. CAIR was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism funding trial in U. S. history, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation.David Yerushalmi and Robert Muise of AFLC, our superb legal team in many of our AFDI/SIOA lawsuits, have also filed a lawsuit against Hamas-linked CAIR:
AFLC Files Motion and Memorandum of Law in CAIR Undercover Operations Case
ICNA Relief Promotes Jihad Donations
ICNA Relief Promotes Jihad Donations
May 2, 2012
The charitable wing of a major American Muslim organization is promoting donations to extremist causes, undercutting a nationwide campaign to improve its image. The website link from the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) Relief division hints at deeper connections to extremism and terror, both by the charitable branch and by its parent organization.
ICNA's self-proclaimed goal is "to communicate the message of Islam to the society at large" and "also to initiate change in the social and political spheres [of American society] in light of the principles of the noble Qur'an," according to the group's 2020 Vision program.
"The future of Dawah [proselytizing] in this society is directly linked with the ability of ICNA's membership to communicate the message of Islam to the society at large," it explains. Over time, the group encourages "moving to the next level of Dawah, aimed towards the movers and shakers of the society."
As that program outlines, that goal means more engagement with non-Muslims to promote Islam. ICNA is in the midst of a pro-Sharia campaign, which explains that Islamic law isn't something threatening to American society or order.
A long history of extremism stands in the way. ICNA's magazine, conferences, and ideology have promoted violent jihad and supremacy rhetoric for decades, and continue to emphasize Islam as a civilization alternative to secular society.
The group's 2010 Member's Hand Book illustrated how further acceptance of Islam would lead to an Islamic state in America and then to a global Caliphate. "With this work of propagation of Islam, social reform, and the truth is introduced to a large part of the society. A good part of the society's thinking individuals join the movement. Then it may move to establish an Islamic society, obedient to Allah's commands," the hand book states.
To change beliefs about Islam and to further ICNA's role in promoting it, the 2020 plan emphasizes social justice and charity issues. But the discovery of more extremist content on ICNA Relief's website shows that although the group has initiated a new public image, an ideology of extremism prevails just under the surface.
The charity website links to a chapter about the giving of zakat, obligatory tithing, from Let Us Be Muslim, a text by Islamist preacher Abu Ala Maududi. He was the founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, a South Asian extremist organization that advocates the overthrow of secular governments and their replacement with a worldwide Islamic state.
The section from Let Us Be Muslim, a fundamental text used in many of ICNA's education curricula teaching extremism, promotes giving "Fi-Sabili'llah: in the way of Allah." Maududi defines this in the chapter as "giving help to a struggle for making Islam supreme on earth."
In addition, the terminology of "making Islam supreme" is a constant theme throughout ICNA's indoctrination programs. A 2008 presentation on the ICNA Southern California website explains the "goal of the Islamic Call" as the "extermination of pre-Islamic traditions or Jahaliya [ignorant ways of life]" and "mak[ing] Islam the predominant way of life" on earth.
The link on ICNA Relief's page promotes these sentiments even further, explaining that charity should be spent to further violent causes.
"Thus, we are told, there are two ways we can lead our lives. One is the way of God… To walk on this path, you must generously help your brothers and support Jihad out of whatever resources God in His bounty and wisdom has given you," Maududi wrote in the section ICNA Relief links readers. "The other is the Satanic way: apparently full of benefits, but in reality it leads to ruin. The hallmark of this way of life is worshipping money and amassing wealth at the expense of all other considerations."
Theological justifications for supporting militancy aren't new to ICNA or ICNA Relief. Currently, ICNA members proceed through a two-tiered system of membership, which requires an ideological commitment to the philosophy of political Islamism, as envisioned by thinkers like Maududi.
One leader, ICNA New York President Ashrafuz Zaman Khan, is alleged to have carried out war crimes in the name of Maududi's violent pan-Islamist ideology.
Open support for terrorist causes was available on the websites of regional ICNA branches, even after 9/11. As late as November 2002, the ICNA Southeast Zone website linked to the websites of Hamas, Hizballah, and terrorist organizations fighting in Chechnya, Afghanistan, and the Pakistani-Indian disputed region of Kashmir. Among its short list of recommended Islamic charities was the Islamic Society in Gaza, which openly touted its connections to Hamas.
The group's magazines and conferences similarly promote connections to violent jihad and terrorist organizations going back dozens of years.
An article in the October 1995 edition of ICNA's The Message Magazine features an interview with ICNA Relief director Tariqur Rehman about the crisis in Bosnia. Rehman describes how he "witnessed first hand" the religious progress of Bosnian army and mujahideen, and notes how they needed "weapons, heavy weapons." Although the United States fought against the Serbian genocide of the Bosnians, it cracked down on Islamic charity Benevolence International Foundation for supplying Islamist warriors fighting there. Al-Qaida-linked mujahideen used Bosnia as a training base, exporting fighters who would take bring jihad back to their home countries, including battling in Iraq against American forces.
An October 1997 article in the magazine, "Kashmiri Commander Speaks," features an exclusive interview with Salahuddin Ahmed, supreme commander of terrorist organization Hizbul Mujahideen and chairman of the United Jihad Council. Ahmed's terrorist coalition at the time included groups like 2001-terror-designees Lashkar-e-Taiba and Harakat al-Ansar, which was proscribed the same month as the article.
In "Kashmiri Commander Speaks," Salahuddin advocates on behalf of the jihad in Kashmir and discusses the role American Muslims can play. "The Kashmiris need concrete military and material support, and also the support of the Muslim Ummah, especially, on diplomatic and political levels," he says. He also quotes a Quranic verse when asked if he has "any message from the Muslims in America."
"Our message for the brothers in America and the outside world is in terms of the Holy Qur'an: 'And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of those who being weak are ill-treated (and oppressed)?" he quotes.
In the same issue, writer Lena Winfrey Sayyed writes of the importance of fighting Jews in Israel and of supporting violent jihad in a more general way.
"One of the duties a Muslim is given by Allah is to make jihad (struggle). It can mean armed combat, but this may not be possible for everyone," Sayyed says. "Other acts are considered jihad. For example, a hadith [saying of the prophet Muhammad] states that one who supports a fighter with weapons or other means gets the same reward as the one fighting."
The same sentiments have been expressed in conferences and rallies. At its 2001 annual conference, then-ICNA President Zulfiqar Ali Shah led the audience in an Arabic chant of "Our way, our way, is jihad, jihad."
He explained his remarks to the conference as referring to violent jihad and a duty to support Muslims at war. "Whether they are brothers in Palestine or Kashmir, they belong to the Muslim ummah and we are united with them in their struggle," he said. "We stand for them and we are for their support and for the victory in Muslim [sic - Islam]. Let's give a big takbir [elevation of Allah's name] for our mujahideen brothers and sisters in Kashmir."
In earlier years, terrorist leaders and extremists were given platforms at ICNA conferences. Senior Hamas member Muhammad Siyam addressed the audience during the 1990 conference together with the deputy head of Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan, Khurshid Ahmed.
When ICNA talks of charitable contributions and social justice, it is promoting a message tailored to a Western audience, not to its own membership. This new ICNA Relief link, with the organization's decades of radical education and rhetoric, show that ICNA's leadership still believes in supporting jihad and pursuing Islamic supremacy.
Khairat al-Shater on "The Nahda Project" (Complete Translation)
Khairat al-Shater on "The Nahda Project" (Complete Translation)
Current Trends in Islamist Ideology
Translator's Note: After his release from prison in March 2011, the Deputy Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) Khairat Al-Shater was reportedly tasked by the Brotherhood's Guidance Council to perform a comprehensive review of the movement's overall strategy in post-Mubarak Egypt. This new strategy, which is supposed to reflect the fact of the MB's rise as the most powerful political force in Egypt today, has often been referred to as "The Nahda Project." (Nahda means "Renaissance" or "Rise".)
We know very little about Al-Shater as politician. He has been described as the "Iron Man" of the Brotherhood movement. As one of Egypt's most successful businessmen, his prestigious stature within the MB's ranks might be attributed to his financial support to the movement. His prestige also derives from the enormous personal suffering that he has endured for the MB's cause: He has spent more than half of the past two decades in prison, and his property has been confiscated twice in the same period. Al-Shater, moreover, has very strong business ties across the region: in Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, among other places. He is also said to be a major supporter of Hamas.
When the Muslim Brotherhood sought to bring down the present Prime Minister Kamal El-Ganzouri and his cabinet, it was not surprising that their nominee for the office was Khairat Al-Shater. When, more recently, the Brotherhood failed to force their will on the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, the movement decided to renege on all of their reassuring promises since the outbreak of the Egyptian Revolution in 2011 and run a candidate in the upcoming presidential elections. Once more, this candidate was Khairat Al-Shater.
Therefore, the importance of Al-Shater and his project cannot be exaggerated. The following text is a complete English translation of a lecture Al-Shater gave in Alexandria, Egypt on April 21, 2011. The lecture, which is entitled "Features of Nahda: Gains of the Revolution and the Horizons for Developing," is perhaps the single most important elaboration to date of not only Al-Shater's worldview and politics, but of the MB's plan for the future of Egypt and the region more generally in the post-Mubarak era.
The following translation of Al-Shater's speech is based on a transcription of a video recording of the lecture, available at: Gum’a Amin, Deputy General Guide and our mentor for a long time, and to all of our mentors in Alexandria, and likewise to our sisters in the Administrative Office, thanks to all of you , and may God reward you well and bless you, and accept your deeds and ours. I truly feel great happiness to have this meeting today with my brothers in Alexandria, after prisons have deprived us for a long time from meeting you and enjoying your company, and this was bestowed upon us by God after the success of the great revolution of this kind and blessed people, so may got reward you well.
Our talk today is about the developing of Ikhwani work. As you all know that His Grace the [General] Guide and the Guidance Bureau charged me with the supervision over the issue of developing Ikhwani Work. This matter, as you all know, is an imperative and continuous one. We were taught that Ihsan is an important degree in the life of the Muslim which he constantly seeks by pursuing the causes for improving [one's] work up to the highest degree of mastery. We were also taught that wisdom is the believer's objective, wherever he finds it he is the most worthy of it. And, we were taught that the mercy of God comes to him who came to know his times, so that his path became straightforward. Therefore one's [i.e. our] approach, while keeping faith in the General Rules of the Islamic method, is to continuously examine reality and the changes he or his Ummah experience, or that occur in his life or in that of the Gama'a, so as to pursue the causes which render his methods, manners and means compatible with this reality; benefitting from all its positive changes while minimizing the effects of its negative changes. The issue of improvement, betterment, mastery, developing or changing for the better is one which is concomitant to the nature of the Islamic Movement and Islamic thought; occasionally, however, some circumstances and major transformations occur in the life of the Ummah or the Gama'a which make the issue of developing and change even more pressing; and none more significant than the historical moment which Egypt and most of the peoples and states of the region are now experiencing. We call upon God Almighty to make this transformation the beginning of a new Nahda for the Ummah and the shaking off of he state of backwardness from which it has suffered for decades.
As Ikhwan, it is imperative that we, as well as the entirety of the Ummah God Willing, take advantage of this revolution which took place in Egypt and continues in the countries surrounding us, and which undoubtedly represents a historical moment and a major new transformative stage. This makes the issue of developing even more of an obligation as I mentioned. But what do we mean by the developing of Ikhwani work; i.e. what is the nature of such developing? Does it involve the entirety of Ikhwani work or parts of it but not others? What are the mechanisms which we will apply in the process of developing? Who is responsible for the planning of developing, and who is responsible for executing the matters which we will agree to develop? Before answering these questions I find myself in need of discussing a number of introductions to which you are undoubtedly privy due to your understanding of the Da’wah and its history, however I shall mention them for the sake of reminding and because I will infer some of the issues related to developing around them.
The first introduction is that I would like us remember and review together briefly the general framework for our method and our way of working as Muslim Brothers because we need to distinguish within this framework between Constants and Variables. Naturally, Constants are not subject to developing, hanging, addition or omission; only Variables are. You all know that our main and overall mission as Muslim Brothers is to empower God’s Religion on Earth, to organize our life and the lives of people on the basis of Islam, to establish the Nahda of the Ummah and its civilization on the basis of Islam, and to subjugation of people to God on Earth.
All of these are synonyms conveying the same meaning. This is why one of the Ikhwan’s preachers said [cut in video]
Everywhere, the Ikhwan are working to restore Islam in its all-encompassing conception to the lives of people, and they believe that this will only come about through the strong society. Thus the mission is clear: restoring Islam in its all-encompassing conception; Subjugating people to God; instituting the religion of God; the Islamization of life, empowering of God’s religion; establishing the Nahda of the Ummah on the basis of Islam. All of these synonymous phrases give the same meaning, intention or definition, and that is the overall mission which we are seeking to accomplish as Ikhwan.
We were also taught in method of the Muslim Brotherhood that with regard to this overall mission: Imam Al-Banna, may he rest in peace, through his understanding of the Prophet’s method (PBUH) and his way of instituting religion, outlined for us a number of stages or secondary objectives which, after their completion, eventually lead to the achievement of this overall mission. Thus we’ve learned [to start with] building the Muslim individual, the Muslim family, the Muslim society, the Islamic government, the global Islamic State and reaching the status of Ustathiya with that State. If all of these secondary objectives are completed, the overall mission is achieved, that is the Empowerment of God's Religion.
We also learned in the method of the Muslim Brotherhood that this overall mission and these secondary goals can only be achieved by means of the strong Gama'a . The Gama'a is therefore the one primary instrument to achieve this overall mission and these secondary goals. We say Islam disappeared from life, thus preachers of the Ikhwan undertook the work of restoring Islam in its all-encompassing conception to the lives of people, and they believed that this would only come by way of the strong Gama'a . This is the same idea as that was expressed by His Eminence Omar Bin Al-Khattab (may allah be pleased with him), which some scholars attribute to the prophet himself, stating that “there is no religion without a Gama'a , no Gama'a without an Imam, and no Imam without obedience.”
The Gama'a is thus an instrument and not a long-term goal. It is an instrument or means to Islamize life in its entirety and institute religion as his Eminence Omar said, and as such, this is part of the constants which we believe in as Ikhwan. The primary instrument for implementing this project is the Gama'a , not the Party or any other means, because whoever studies the jurisprudence of instituting religion as established by our master the prophet (PBUH) will find that the instrument which our he used was the Gama'a .
The party, my brothers, as an instrument, means, or vessel, is not born of the Islamic idea, or of the Islamic experience, or of the Islamic model. Rather, it is one of the various products of Western civilization, the Western model, or the Western Nahda. It is an instrument or a vessel for the deliberation of power in the political space, an instrument for [engaging in] the conflict for the sake of obtaining power. The Gama'a , on the other hand, is not an instrument of conflict or competition. The Gama'a is an instrument of integration and rallying of the entire Ummah in order to build its Nahda on the basis of Islam.
Therefore in our process of developing and changing, it is would not be possible if someone says "the Gama'a should become a party", or "forget about the society and let's establish a party or two or three", because the party is a vessel born of the Western idea which has a particular nature within particular limitations; it is designed and conceived, as manifested by everything from its philosophy to its methods, for the political process which is only one part of the greater Nahda project in politics, economy, society, education, morals, values, behavior, children, women, the elderly, the young. Every aspect of life is to be Islamized and the primary instrument for this is the Gama'a . The Gama'a may establish a party, an association, schools, and many other means for some of the secondary tasks; but the Gama'a is to remain the instrument which establishes an entire life for the Ummah on the basis of Islamic reference or the basis of the Islamic method.
We also learned in the Ikhwan’s method and in the jurisprudence of instituting religion as applied by God’s prophet (PBUH) that this Gama'a has a Shar'i definition, a specific meaning, as well as special characteristics. If these characteristics are not attained within a community of human beings we cannot call it an Islamic Gama'a , which His Eminence Omar meant to be the instrument for instituting religion.
The Gama'a has two primary prerequisites that must be on hand. The Ulama have said the first prerequisite is the strength of the psychological construction of the Gama'a 's individuals. Every individual in the Gama'a should be [an] Islam, a walking Quran, his deeds should be the Quran; his faith, worship, manners, relationships, and all that is related to his behavior, thoughts, and emotions should be identical with the Islam that Muhammad (PBUH) got from God Almighty.
So if this psychological construction is present, does that alone bring a Gama'a into being? They said "no", a strong organizational construction is imperative. His Eminence Omar says “there is no religion without a Gama'a , and no Gama'a without an Imam”, this means officials, structures and groups; a particular structure, not just a matter of circumstance. This structure also needs to be obeyed and committed to. The structure applies Shura in decision-making, but when a decision is reached, all levels [of the structure] must commit and obey.
So we are Groups, Families, Branches, Regions and officials, the form of such structure may change from one era to another, but the idea is that there must be an organization, there must be work, and in this system there must remain certain degrees of commitment. So it is not possible for us to call any gathering a Gama'a , as in the technical term of the Islamic movement, where each can do what he wants or anyone with an idea different from that of the majority comes out saying it or committing to it. Not any existing gathering is a Gama'a , even if it were a group of good people who are committed to Islam; they are not a Gama'a as such without their structures and officials, no system, commitment, and obedience.
The Gama'a thus requires the strength of psychological construction and the strength of organizational construction. The organizational construction needs structures, officials, and relationships that bind them. The Ulama classified these relationships into Ikhwan, trust and obedience. [Political] Parties always talk about partisan commitment, which is synonymous with obedience; meaning that people hear and execute the party’s policy and commit to its instructions, so the analogous term we have for Partisan commitment is obedience. However, we have two [other] important issues, that of Ikhwan and that of trust. These relationships must be present, so we won’t call just any gathering a Gama'a , and we won’t call just any individual a member of a Gama'a , if he didn’t commit and can’t be described by these characteristics on the level of personal piety as a Muslim person and on the level of adherence to the particular relationships of Ikhwan, confidence and commitment to the Gama'a . We can’t call such an individual a member of a Gama'a , even if he refers to himself as such, because the issue at stake isn’t what I say about myself, it is in the criteria of how I behave, if these characteristics are present in me or not?
It is not possible for someone to say I’m one of the Ikhwan despite his lacking some of these characteristics in the first place, even if he himself is a virtuous and pious brother. This is why Imam Al-Banna in his memoirs warned of the pious unorganized man or he who always breaks ranks because the issue is not only one of individual piety, but rather with individual piety the issues connected to organizational developing must also be present.
Thus, we learned in the Muslim Brotherhood’s method that the overall mission to empower God’s religion or establish the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic reference, from the Muslim individual to Ustathia; a mission that can only be achieved through the Gama'a which has certain prerequisites and characteristics. We also learned that this Gama'a , in order to achieve this objective, mission and objectives, must proceed along three lines: definition, formation and execution.
When Imam Al-Banna told us that these are the fundamentals of the Muslim Brotherhood method, he did not come up with them, nor was it he who invented them, but rather when he examined the method of the Prophet (PBUH) and how he instituted the religion of God Almighty in the first stage after [receiving] the revelation and found this framework. The Prophet strove to achieve this mission and these objectives; he formed this Gama'a with these characteristics and attributes, and during the time of the prophet this Gama'a proceeded along the lines of definition, formation and execution.
Thus this part of our method represents constants and there is no room for discussion about change and developing. No one can come and say “let’s change the overall mission”. No one can say “let’s remove one of these objectives”. No one can say “instead of the Gama'a let’s make a party or two”. No one can say “we’ll work along three lines other than definition, formation and execution.” No one can say "forget about obedience, discipline and structures of the Gama'a claiming that we can call any gathering a Gama'a ". No. All of these are constants that represent the fundamental framework for our method; the method of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is not open to developing or change.
We have reviewed the stages from the Individual to Ustathiya, but where are we now along these stages? I mean are we now at the stage of the Individual, Household, society, Government, Global Islamic State or Ustathiya? To answer this question we look at our situation and our history. His Eminence the Prophet (PBUH), before he met his creator, had already made headway for the Muslim Gama'a under his leadership, regarding the household, individual, and society stages, and he established the Islamic state in Medina. He then began to exoand this state to cover the Arabian Peninsula, and then began the launch of the Global State of Islam; and the evidence is that Ghzawat Mo'tah took place in his time (PBUH), and we all know that Mo'tah is in Jordan and not in the Arabian Peninsula.
Therefore, the path was clear, thus the Rashidun (rightly-guided) Caliphs, God’s grace upon all of them, continued the stage of the Global State of Islam, and so its domain expanded, and the Persian and Roman (Byzantine) States fell as the new state of Islam emerged on the global level. This state arrived after some time to the point where it became the strongest state in existence, and therefore Ustathia was actualized in reality. This, my brothers, was concluded in forty or fifty years and endured for more than 1000 years. Sometime, Ustathia was lost and in others, like in the period of the Tatar War (Mongul Invasion), the Caliphate fell in Baghdad but because Islamic regimes and governments were present in states in Egypt, Palestine, and North Africa, Muslims gathered together again, fought and defeated the Tatars, restored the Caliphate once more, and after a while, the Caliphate returned to a state of greatness.
The last form of the Islamic Caliphate was the Ottoman government, but last century, it first lost the state of Ustathia which had been present but in a weak form. Hence we lost Ustathia and then after this the Caliphate itself collapsed. If Islam had been governing our states and countries in Egypt, Libya, the Hejaz, and so forth, perhaps it would have been possible to pursue the reinstatement of the Global State of Islam. However, what happened was that many of the states of the Islamic world had been occupied [by Western powers] before or after the fall of the Caliphate. The English (British) came to Egypt in 1882 and [before that] went to India. The French descended upon the Levantine region, Lebanon, Algeria and Tunisia. Italy descended upon Libya. Holland went to Indonesia. The colonial states spread across all of our states to a large extent, and, step by step, secular systems were put in place [of Muslim ones] with regard to the organization of the lives of Muslims in their petty states, so that in the end we couldn't say that we have an Islamic System of Government in any of these states.
What was changed first in Egypt was the judicial or legal system. They said “you all govern yourselves in Shari’a courts; here we have foreigners so we’ll create special courts for them.” After a little while they told us “foreigners are feuding with Egyptians, so we’ll make mixed courts.” After a little while these mixed courts became the norm, relying on positive (man-made) laws, with the exception of personal status laws, in addition very little articles in civil or criminal codes which might be said to be related to the Islamic Judicial system.
After that came the economic system. Muslims didn’t know the system of interest or banks or management of the economy on the basis of capitalism. So after changing the laws step by step as well, the secular economic system, or the capitalist system, was also instated in the place of the system which had been dominant in our Islamic states, the same happened in education and in most of the other matters.
The crucial issue here is the systems which are being implemented, not only whether the president is nominally Muslim or is chosen in an Islamic manner even if that had happened – and it didn’t. What is more important and more dangerous than this was that in the end, we are saying that an Islamic system in our countries means that the various areas of our life are organized on the basis of Islam, on the basis of the Islamic idea, or Islamic Reference, however this system was replaced one part after the other, so that the systems which are implemented in all of our Muslim countries became secular systems, systems imported from the West or the East, but not Islamic systems. I am not addressing the issue of Takfir, since this is not the subject of my discussion right now, but the criteria for the organization of the various aspects of our lives is no longer based on Islam, and as such we have lost Ustathiya, we have lost the Caliphate or the Global State of Islam, and we have also lost Islamic governments on the single-country level.
So for the first time Muslims became exposed. For the first time Muslims had no state and no Sultan. There was no government protecting religion’s territory. That was it. For the first time in the history of Muslims and with the fall of the Caliphate, secular systems were substituted for the existing systems of life and government in our petty states, our society became completely exposed since there was no Sultan. The words of His Eminence Omar “No religion without a Gama'a and no Gama'a without an Imam”: there was no Imam, there is now no regime protecting religion in the lives of these people.
When this happened, there were reactions in the Islamic world to this new tragedy as to what we were supposed to do. His Grace Imam Mohamed Abduh, may he rest in peace, said that the solution lies in the reform of religious education. Sheikh Mohamed Ibn Abd Al-Wahab in the Hejaz said that the solution lies in combating Bid'as of creed. Sheikh Mahmoud Al-Sobky, the founder of the Shari’a Association in Egypt, may he rest in peace, said the solution lies in combating Bid'as of rituals. The Sennusi movement in Libya and the Mahdiyya in Sudan said the solution lies in liberating the occupied homeland first.
Developments, visions and initiatives emerged for dealing with this new reality, but the problem is that none of these paid attention to the fact that the situation had changed and that for the first time we were outside the sphere of government or authority. We became a society without a government that represents Islam. Therefore, [we ask] Imam Mohammed Abduh, who is going to reform the religious education if the new government imposes a secular system which doesn’t want a religious educational system in the first place? It brought us an educational system tied to the Western model. Also who will fight Bid'as? Who will do anything?
There was no clear answer to this question. The first person, as far as we know, to be aware of the change in the situation, was Imam Al-Banna, may God have mercy on him. He acknowledged that the equation had changed, that we were now outside the realm of state and authority, so he researched the history of Muslims in order to find what the solution was when something like this happened previously. He found that there was no precedent in the lives of all Muslims, because we never in our history lost Ustathiya, the Caliphate or government at the level of the states. Even when the Caliphate fell in the days of the Tatars, or was weakened in the days of the Crusaders, there was Qutuz in Egypt; there was someone here or there, and the situation was rectified. But there was no similar experience in over a thousand years in the history of Muslims, so Al-Banna did not find anything but in the method of the Prophet (PBUH) and his early biography; he was the [only] one who instituted religion without being in the seat of power. Where did he start from then? He started with the Muslim individual, the household, and the society. He established the Muslim Gama'a through under his leadership (PBUH).
So Imam Al-Banna, may God have mercy on him, went back to the method of the Prophet (PBUH) and studied his jurisprudence or his Way of instituting religion, and thus he extracted this Way, explained it and outlined it for us in what is known as the method of the Muslim Brotherhood. Therefore, my brothers, the Muslim Brotherhood’s method is that of the Prophet's (PBUH), and thus we say that the Muslim who is connected to the Gama'a and the method must believe and realize that he is on the right path and that he must not be on a path other than this one. One of the fundamental prerequisites to develop the Brother within the Gama'a is to realize that you are on the right path and that you must not be on a path other than this one.
As Ikhwan we have spent a long time working on the individual, walking along this line, working on the household, working on society. So we are now developing the Muslim individual and God willing we will continue. We are developing the Muslim household and God willing we will continue. We are developing the Muslim society and God willing we will continue. We are preparing for the stage of Islamic government after this because it is what follows the stage of society. Our preparation for the stage of Islamic government does not, as the secularists understand it, entail us striving to reach the seat of government ourselves, no. Our one and only concern is for there to be a government that is faithful to the method of our Lord Almighty, a government keen on establishing the lives of people on the basis of Islamic reference, whether it be us or someone else.
We are different from other parties; the issue is not that we ourselves need to govern as some think. No. The issue is that we are working on the stage of society, and we are preparing this society for the stage of Islamic government which is what organizes the remaining aspects of people’s lives outside the scope of society such as economics, politics and all other fields, on the basis of Islamic Reference.
So this is our first introduction: Our mission is to develop the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference. This mission requires the progression through a number of stages from the individual to Ustathiya. Our primary tool, based on the method of the Prophet (PBUH) is the Gama'a , which has characteristics and components, and must proceed along the three lines of progress. On the historical or realistic front, we are at the stage of society, and about to be in the stage government alongside which we must continue to work on the individual and the household. This first introduction outlines our overall mission and our instrument, and delineates that which is constant in our method, that which is not subject to developing or change because it is connected to the method of the Prophet (PBUH).
As for the second introduction: when we talk about developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference, some [people] do not realize how deep the issue of Islamic Reference is; they imagine that it is an emotional word or that I can take the experience of Japan, of Britain, of Malaysia, of Turkey, or any other experience and dress it an Islamic appearance or Islamic outfit. The issue is not like this. The issue is that the Islamic method is a substantial method that deeply impacts the organization of [all] aspects of life. This needs to be clear before us; it is not a matter of an emotional or a formalistic slogan, but rather a substantial and fundamental issue.
So for example, when we come to the political regime based on Islamic reference, we will find that Islam outlines General Rules for life, in its political conception, amidst the Muslim society, country or people. One General Rule, among others, for example states "their affairs being Shura (counsel) between them". This means that all the decision-making mechanisms inside the Muslim society become based on Shura, and means also that the choices of officials and representatives at the various levels should be based on Shura. As for the system we will use in decision-making or the organization of our political lives; or the issues of whether we will choose a parliamentary republican system or a presidential republican system; or whether we will have unicameral or bicameral legislature; or whether we will elect one president of the republic, or the ruler or primary official, or three or four and not one; whether we will choose them directly or by way of representation; all of these issues, my brothers, are subject to Ijtahad.
We cannot take the words of His Eminence Omar Ibn Al-Khattab which were present in his time as a framework or executive structure for the administration of the state, and say that it will be useful to us today. For our Lord Almighty, because he knew that the variables in life would be many, outlined for us a number of rules. It is demanded of us that the Muslim political scientist living in our time apply Ijtihad and start to tell us the design of the political system that we will use. On what basis does he lay down this system? The General Rule, "their affairs being Shura between them", the experiences of Muslims from the days of His Eminence the Prophet to the present, and human experiences in general if he finds in them something useful. The Muslim political scientist comes to do this and lay down the system, and since [the process] involves human beings, reality and experience, if we said to three people to engage in Ijtihad each one by himself, it is possible that he three will come up with three systems similar to each other, and also possible that the three to come up with somewhat different ones.
Who is it to delineate the system which the Ummah will commit to and apply to its life? [It is] the Ummah itself. Thus the matter is posed to the Ummah, to the public organization, to the council (parliament) which represents it, and they decide on the most favorable political system to apply and use. So for example if a Mujtahid says "nothing will work with you but a Just Despot", we would say no, because this contradicts the General Rule, "their affairs being counsel between them"; a despot does not work. If a Mujtahid who had studied the experience of the Soviet Union in a particular historical stage came and said the idea that the workers should rule is plausible because they are the ones who produce and work in the factories, we say no, because the General Rule, "their affairs being counsel between them", didn’t say "the affairs of workers"; affairs, rather, refers to the entire people.
What I mean by this discussion, my brothers, is that for the systems that we will use in organizing our lives on the political, economic, social or educational level, there are rules that govern them, and there are Islamic experiences, and the matter requires Ijtihad. So it’s not possible for me to take experience X or Y and say this is what I’m going to use and that’s it, because it might not conform with these rules which exist for us, in addition to the fact that Islam posits some of details about the characteristics of the Ruler or official, and about the [rules] governing his relationship, [considering duties and rights], with the citizens. Thus the Islamic system is a system which has substance. It has conceptions and rules which govern it. It has means and modes. Of course, Muslims stopped living their lives according to Islamic reference, we’ve spent 200 to 300 years, so what Muslims see now are the models of the West, Japan, China, Korea, or others, because there are now no systems based on Islamic Reference among all of present states of the Sunni people throughout the entire world.
The third introduction is a historical introduction specific to the period of twenty or thirty years, i.e. the period which just passed. You all know that the Society of the Muslim Brothers, and as such its method of working to institute God Almighty’s method and empowering God’s religion in the lives of people, stopped since the year 1954 and disappeared until the second half of the seventies of the last century; for more than twenty years. It is true that there was the organization of 1965 but the numbers and duration were limited and the public did not feel its presence strongly. So we can all say that the Ikhwan disappeared from 1954 to 1974 roughly, because there were some of the Ikwan that showed up in 1972 and 1973 but their numbers were small. Had this absence been for a short time, hadn’t there been misrepresentation of the Ikhwan's method, and hadn’t there been another model presented, i.e. the Nasserist model, which they tried to spread to a great extent; if the Ikhwan were for example imprisoned for two years, and the number of prisoners were three or four thousand while there were a hundred thousand outside, then the Muslim Brotherhood was brought back, it would have been easy to reorganize their ranks and reestablish their structure. What happened, however, was that most or a large fraction of the Ikhwan were sent to prison, and for a long time, the Nasserite model was massively propagated, and it was heavily attempted to misrepresent the method and ways of the Muslim Brotherhood.
As such we are able to say that there was a long period of severance that affected the history of the Ikhwan’s work in Egypt. For when the Ikhwan got out of prisons during the second half of the seventies or at the end of the first half, they started the re-establishment of the Gama'a or the second establishment of Society of the Muslim Brothers. This issue of establishment is of course important and necessary because we said in the first introduction that the primary tool for empowering God’s religion is establishing the Gama'a and considering the discussion of His Eminence Omar that there is no religion without a Gama'a . So it was imperative for the Muslim Brothers when they left the prisons to establish or re-establish the Gama'a after it was made to disappear for a long time.
It might be true that there was a group of Ikhwan present in prison that stayed in contact with each other in some form or another and in some cases organizational connections emerged, however this was far removed from the reality of society. The Gama'a wasn’t present or widespread in cities and villages. There were no structures and as such it was the primary mission of the Ikhwan who got out of prison during the beginning of the seventies was the re-establishment of the Gama'a. This is of course, my brothers, a process that took a long time and toward which enormous efforts were exerted, because there were no Groups, no Families, no Branches, no Regions, no administrative offices, and no Shura Council. Some of the old members of the Guidance Bureau were in prison, and they retained their positions when they got out in the beginning of the process of re-establishing the Gama'a, but the rest of the structure was not present and, as I said a little while ago, if the matter had just been imprisonment for two or three years followed by their release, their regrouping and re-organization would have been simple. However this was for twenty years or more, and another intellectual model was propagated, that being the Nasserite model.
When the Ikhwan were released and began the re-establishment, the first stage during the first year or two was an attempt to get acquainted with the existing reality. Later they began the attempt to correct the negative image which Nasser and his regime had drawn for on the Ikhwan. So they began their activities on this basis and then moved to the issue of Da'wa (calling) to Islam in its totality, introducing Islam in its totality, and began to introduce the Muslim Brotherhood’s method. Then they scouted for elements [in society] which were prepared to believe in this method, so efforts were exerted to educate them, followed by the process of organizing them in groups. When the work first started, there was a group at the central level in Cairo [consisting of] Ustath Umar El-Tilmisani (may God have mercy on him), Ustath Mustafa Mashhur (may God have mercy on him), Doctor Ahmed El-Malt (may God have mercy on him), Al-Hajj Hosni; there was a group of twenty, thirty, or forty Ikhwan present. In the other governorates there were also groups. In Alexandria there was Al-Hajj Abbass As-Sissi, Al-Hajj Mahmoud Shukri, and many other names. However we are still talking about twenty or thirty Ikhwan in the governorates; there were also some two to six working in each governorate.
Some people, my brothers, underestimate the issue of the re-establishment of Ikhwani work in the seventies by reducing it to student activism. This is wrong. Some people reduce it to activism in Cairo University, and this is an even bigger mistake. Some go so far as to Qasr Al-Aini Faculty of Medicine (Cairo University Medical School) , and this is also incorrect. I was a witness to this stage, so was Ustath Guma’a [Amin] and Ustath Muhamed Hussein and many others.
The Ikhwan were released and began their activities in the governorates. Tt is true they focused on working in the universities because there was an Islamic revival present after the setback of 67; a divine Islamic revival. The Islamic work that started after 67 began gradually, and every year was improving on the last, but the work lacked a vision or a project; meaning that we were trying to be religious, we were trying to serve our religion, but we didn’t know how. I said in the introduction that in the Ikhwan’s method there’s an overall mission of instituting God’s Sharia and developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islam, that there are sub-goals from the individual to Ustathiya, that the primary instrument is the Gama'a which has specific characteristics, and that the Gama'a must proceed along the three lines. This is a method. This is a vision. This is a comprehensive project known as the Islamic project which the Ikhwan are trying to accomplish.
Our blessed revival in the universities, however, was a random revival of religiosity without a clear vision for the way of instituting religion. I remind my mentor Ustath Mohamed Hussein, it was 1973, and I and a group of my colleagues were finishing our BA in Engineering, we were sitting together with and Ustath Mohammed was with us, and were wondering what we were going to do when we leave the university. Would we go to Al-Mansoura, or Port Said and spend some time in each cit? We were now used to Islamic activism in the university, we know what we were doing there, and things went on even if there was no project. But when we return to our homes, in what ways will we become active and how? We didn’t find a clear and specific answer, so I personally decided not to take the exam that year and actually postponed my graduation a year because we agreed, and Ustath Mohamed Hussein was with us, that we would form a group and study what methods are available. But if we did not like any of them, was it possible for us to make our own method? We sat, talked and studied we'd study Creed, History, Islamic Movements and many other issues, in order to put forth a conception for when we leave the university and how we would continue our activities.
Why am I telling you this story? So that you realize, my brothers, the nature of this stage, that there was no clear vision and that there was a huge amount of suffering. When the Ikhwan were released from prison, though their numbers were small relative to the total number of students, this blessed revival started to have a vision before it, and they began to mobilize our brothers [in the university] and illuminate for them the mission, goals and the Gama'a as a project. So there was some response from the individuals taking part in the Islamic revival, and there were people who chose the Salafi line, while our brothers in Upper Egypt took another path. I remember after we agreed to stay a year in order to figure out what we were going to do, I graduated and went to work at Mansoura University, and I didn’t sense that there was a problem because the there were Islamic activists in the university. After a while Ustath Mohamed Hussein and a group of brothers were beginning to become convinced with the Ikhwan’s method. He came and visited me so as to discuss the subject. Before discussing anything, he told me we would go to Friday prayer; I told him I would pray in a mosque here where the Ikhwan deliver the sermons. He then answered “That’s it, you’ve made it easier for us, because we came to discuss this [specific] subject, so thank God you’ve made the distance shorter.
Why am I telling you this my brothers? So that you realize the amount of suffering that existed during that time, as well as the amount of effort exerted by the Ikhwan who left prison, and the youth who cooperated with them on the subject of re-establishing the Ikhwan structure or Gama'a . This matter took ten or even fifteen years, not just a few days, because as I said from the beginning, if the incarcerated Ikhwan had served just two years and then released, it would have been easy; they would have exerted a little effort and organized what had existed before. However the matter took a much, much longer time, and the Ikhwan’s project succeeded by the grace of God in most of the universities, then in most of the cities, followed by most of the neighborhoods in the big cities, then the villages and the rural areas.
In the year 1990, the Muslim Brotherhood’s first general elected Shura Council was formed, as were Shura Councils and administrative offices in the governorates; the first elected Guidance Bureau was also chosen in 1990, and after it was based on the historical [contribution] criterion, it became a matter of election that year. The structure became visible everywhere in the entirety of the Arab Republic of Egypt, from Cairo to of all the governorates and villages, in many of the neighborhoods and rural areas. We started to Section, Committees, Branches and Regions: a very, very huge structure. But this was by the blessing and efforts of a great number of the Ikhwan that came out of prison, and those who allied with them, cooperated with them or accepted their project from among the university youth at this time. No one individual or group, whoever that may be, can take credit for this by themselves. It was by the grace of God Almighty that our brothers who were coming out [of prison] were successful in their marketing and calling for the vision of the Ikhwan, spreading it among many of the youth and others so that this structure came into existence. Thus the new generations need to realize the nature of this stage and the efforts that were exerted by our brothers coming out of prison in spite of the their many problems and circumstances resulting from their absence from their homes and families for so long.
A Brother now, by the grace of God, finds everything working: Branches, Regions, Committees, Departments, and Offices. He can go onto Facebook and say “we don’t want the [General] Guide; we don’t want a Guidance Bureau.” However, he grew up in easy and simple circumstances; he didn’t feel the efforts and hardships endured by the Ikhwan in this period, and he is now a passenger on a functioning train, asking for [a choice of] coffee, tea, food, and juice. That’s it, the issue is easy and simple for him; he puts any idea that comes to him on Facebook.
Therefore it is very important my brothers that we realize that very, very great efforts were exerted during this period so that the structure was established and stabilized. When the structure was solidified and started to become present after 1990, it was natural that the Gama'a would begin to prepare for a stage of opening up to society. It started to prepare the path with bigger steps in the project of developing the Nahda of the Ummah on the basis of Islam, because in the stage of establishing the structure, a large part of the Ikhwan’s efforts were directed to building the structure itself, and to re-establishing the Ikhwan. Thus 60-70% of the effort was exerted by the Ikhwan in order to bring back this structure because the issue is not merely re-organization plain and simple. There was spreading the idea and searching for supporters, educating and organizing them, and distributing them across the structure’s units, so 60-70% of the effort was focusing on the structure itself and its re-establishment, and 20-30% was for our work in society and our activities in the mosques.
[Break for Maghreb (Sunset) Prayer]
We participated in the elections for the People’s Assembly in 84’ and 87’; we entered the Union elections and the University Faculties Clubs Elections, and we began working in the mosques and associations. By 1990 or the beginning of the nineties, Ikhwan, represented by His Grace Ustath Moustafa Mashhour, who, may God have mercy on him, was Deputy to the General Guide and responsible for the planning committee in the Muslim Brotherhood during this time, began to be orientated towards opening up more to society and focusing more on the issue of developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference. Directives were indeed put forth, and devising of the plan began, and any of you who goes back to the plan that exists now, or the version that preceded it, will find in it explicit texts indicating that 70% of the Ikhwan’s efforts were directed to work in society.
This was written, but it was not implemented because in the year 1990 or in the beginning of the nineties, an essential change was beginning to take place in the interaction between the Incumbent Regime and the Muslim Brotherhood during this time. Before this time, there was some room for movemoent; I’m not saying room for movement means complete freedom, however there was to a certain extent some degree of freedom with restrictions. The change that occurred was that the regime picked a new strategy. Why did this change occur? The objective of this strategy was to curb, confuse and constrict the Ikhwan. Why though? Many explanations were given, but the most plausible of these was the success of the Islamic Salvation Front in Algeria in the elections. Before that, Mubarak was making statements in the press and international news agencies stating that the Ikhwan could possibly be absorbed into the political process. After the Islamic Salvation Front succeeded to a great extent in Algeria, Mubarak and some of the factions in his regime began to fear that this political process and this marginal position given to the Ikhwan in the form of partial freedom to work, would give them the room to sweep the elections at any time and create a problem.
The new strategy was based on two primary lines. The first line was the enactment of a number of oppressive procedures against the Ikhwan, first manifested in the imprisonment of Ikhwan for various reasons, some of which were connected to the events of day. We all know that during the elections for the People’s Assembly or other elections, some two, three, four, five or even seven thousand of us were kept in prisons. Also, they started a second methodical way which they learned from the Yemeni regime of Imam Ahmed: the Hostage system. In order to control the tribes which he feared would rebel, Imam Ahmed would take as hostage from every tribe the dearest young man to the heart of the leader of the tribe, and keep him in his palace so as to guarantee that this tribe, due to its concern for its son, would stay calm and not cause problems.
So Mubarak applied this system with some modification, and thus began in 1992 by taking groups of Ikhwan and placing them in prisons. These groups always included a number of the higher leaders, a member or two from the Guidance Bureau, someone from the officials in the provinces or departments, and groups of Ikhwan on various administrative levels because his objective was to cause a state of concern, fear or panic for the entire body of the Gama'a . So if he took someone from the Guidance Bureau only, the middle-ranking leaders and the rest of the Gama'a could still work and say that it was the leadership’s fate may God be with them. If it was only individuals from the bottom and the base, the leadership might have said this is a tax and the Ikhwan must pay it and the group will remain in prison for some time and then get out. However, he took groups, that is key sectors from top to bottom in which all levels were represented to that no one inside the body of the Gama'a felt himself safe from prison. It began with groups in 1992 in the Salsabil Case, and he put them in prison from six months to one year in precautionary incarceration. From 1995, he developed the idea by bringing in martial courts, and the sentences became, instead of six months to a year, three to five years.
One case then the nexy, until the last case of 2006 which I was included in, as were Engineer Mehdat [El-Haddad], Ahmed En-Nahas, Gamal Shaaban, Mahmoud Abd Al-Gawad and other Ikhwan from various regions. The price tag became three, five, seven or ten [years]; it grew a little bit. This, my brothers, was primarily meant to cause the maximum amount of fear and confusion to the body of the entire Gama'a. Everyone who was exposed to prison from 92’ all the way to the fall of Mubarak, about 30 thousand Ikhwan, some of whom were imprisoned one, two, three, four, or five times. Every now and again you’d find Medhat in jail, you’d find Mohamed Ibrahim in jail, and you’d find Khairat in jail, and so on. Thirty thousand doesn’t mean thirty thousand incarcerations. No. This is thirty thousand people, many of whom were imprisoned more than once, so huge numbers and multiple incarcerations.
Therefore we all began to put our prison suitcases under our beds as we expected to be imprisoned at any time. Any door that was knocked at 12 or 1 o’clock at night, even if a Brother was coming to you about an issue or with a problem, the first thing to come to your mind was that State Security had arrived. Therefore the issue of incarceration of this type had as its intention to confuse and frighten the Ikhwan, and make them feel unsafe and insecure, and not only that. They prevented our children, Ikhwan and youth from being hired for faculty positions at universities; those who came out first were not appointed as lecturers, or representatives in the union, or in the judiciary, or in the press. Those who worked as teachers in education were moved to administrative positions; those who worked as mosque preachers were moved to administrative positions. He prevented people from traveling. Lately, he started to shut down our companies, and in the year 2000 even cracked down upon nine thousand firms and companies throughout the Republic in the eve of the elections.
Therefore the first line employed by Mubarak from the beginning of the nineties was directing a number of oppressive procedures aimed at individuals and leaders of the Gama'a with the intention of frightening and confusing them, and of course also as a message to society that if you walk with these people your fate will be the same as theirs. So this was the first line of strategy.
The second line was tightening or closing us off from external work outlets. So [we were allowed entry to] no syndicates or unions, parliamentary elections were rigged except for a few exceptional cases, no local councils, mosques; nothing. All venues was being completely closed. He ordered crackdowns on us as individuals, as groups and as Ikhwan, and the tightening of the outside environment in which we could work led to two issues. First, in the language of Administration, when any organization, institution or group is cut off from all the opportunities to work in the outside environment and is struck at its core, it must become significantly weakened almost to the point of dying. But because the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamic Gam’a based on God’s method, our Lord Almighty protected the organization despite the existence of a number of negative effects on the work and objectives of the Gama'a.
Here I don’t necessarily mean by negative effects flaws among the Ikhwan, but rather, to take but one example, when we wanted to hold elections, we either could not hold them [at all], or we held them by passing [the vote from one level to the next]. The last elections for the Guidance Bureau took place when I was in prison. The General Shura Council convened in six or seven places, not just one place. There was a time, during the period of relative openness, when for example; the administrative office grew to 16 or 17 members because the burdens of work are many. But when they entered the Alexandria office and arrested them once then twice, besides the Beheira and other offices, the Ikhwan said 10 is enough for the administrative office.
The issue of Shura itself and its activation [was affected]: in the eighties we used to meet with the Ikhwan, or the Ikhwan officials would meet us like our meeting with you right now. The meetings could maybe have one, two or three thousand; or in the camp in Agami in Abu Talat there were hundreds of Ikhwan and Ikhwan leaders present. We were denied all of this, and therefore our education took place in closed spaces and with limited actions. Our bylaws became highly complicates and our Shura was, to a great extent, suspended. Thus many of our means of decision-making, working and administration, were negatively affected against our will as a result of this difficult circumstance. Were this to happen to any organization, institution or group in any place, it has to suffer some sort of introversion. We are saying this in the context of evaluating our reality so that when we talk about change and developing, we also become aware of the matters which circumstances of confinement and danger imposed on us. Therefore we should change and treat these problems in the coming stage.
The second result achieved by the strategy of Mubarak or his regime was the delaying of our release to expand the project of developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference because we could not open up to society. Even [our] companies in the private sector were closed, even liquidating our associations. In the end, you want involve society and anchor the values of societal participation so that all the people participate in the developing of their own Nahda and that of the Ummah on the basis of Islam. But how do you do that? Through the private sector, through associations, through society’s different institutions, your schools, your hospitals, and all your means and instruments. So when all of this is closed off to you, this prevents you from undertaking your project of developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference. So this was also a major effect, a product of the plan undertaken by Mubarak and his regime starting in the nineties.
So now, by the grace of God and after the revolution, Mubarak and a large part of his regime are gone, and we hope that what remains of the regime is removed and God willing never returns. The Ummah has embarked on a new stage of freedom unknown for long times, having tied the hands of the security institution to a great extent up until now, and God willing it will return to its natural task without harming citizens, as its chief role becomes only that which is outlined by the law and constitution. The obstacle has now been removed, so we must return to the beginning of the matter which we were supposed to have undertaken since the nineties and on which we are expanding now, opening up to society to a great extent, enlightening the entire Ummah, and summoning its strength so that it contributes to the realization of its Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference.
Therefore the Ikhwan’s first and main task is to contribute to the developing of the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference; this is now our essential task. We can’t say that we must focus on the completion or building of the Gama'a because its structure, thanks to God, is very strong. So we may spend 20-30% of the effort on the Gama'a, however we must return to the words of our speeches and attitudes, and spend 60-70% on societal work to anchor the values of participation by everyone. The issue of the Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference, my brothers, is not as easy a subject as its title suggests, because this project of the Ummah’s Nahda does not exist on the level of planning or formulation. This means that efforts are demanded of us to organize and think about what developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islam means. Mubarak, and before him Sadat and the regimes that existed since 52’ did not seek to push Egypt and summon her efforts to participate in the developing of its Nahda on the basis of any method. Even this never happened.
They were focused on the fact that the president, head of state, and inspired leader be the one who directs and executes everything; that his directives be the ones that drive [everything]. That the Ummah be responsible for the developing of its Nahda, the very concept of it, was absent. It was non-existent. Thus today it is required of us that we first contribute alongside the honest and the loyal among the children of this Ummah to the formulation of what the Nahda project means. This “Nahda” is big talk, but in the end we need to have a number of tracks in social, economic, health, education and moral development in many fields. Each of these tracks comprises sub-tracks, and these sub-tracks comprise projects. Who will execute the projects? The people will. The private sector has a role. Civil society associations have a role. All Islamic and non-Islamic institutions have a role. The state also has a role in order to develop the Ummah’s Nahda.
So we, as a people and as a Ikhwan, should contribute to defining what “Nahda” means, and we invite people to take part in the implement of this Nahda. As for the part that is specific to the state, we advise the state or the government. This issue might require pressure, so we hold demonstrations or any type of pressure so that the state fulfills its role. We may, after the coming elections, get part of the cabinet, or part of the government. Therefore we should not neglect or marginalize the aspect specific to the government because it is a major aspect, however we advise government and apply pressure to it, and perhaps participate in government at some point.
Thus now, while discussing the developing of the Nahda, we are required to put effort into formulating the project; we plan, work and discuss the meaning of “Nahda” and the meaning of projects, and who will run the projects. This subject is a big challenge that the Ikhwan must assist in preparing for. After that, besides thought and planning, it is demanded of us that we tell the people how to work and that we help them: those who want to start an association, those who want to form a company, those who want to start a school, those who want start an institution. All of these issues require major efforts because the people don’t have experience. We as Egyptians have some experience only in charity work: a project on supporting orphans, Ramadan [charity] kit, winter clothes or blankets. But now we are talking about efforts for development, about efforts for Nahda, and the topic is much larger than the issue of [social] solidarity. Our thinking needs to be on a wider scale than this.
So we will think and plan, while at the same time we want to arrange for how the work will go, because we are the biggest faction currently present in the Ummah; present, organized and aware of the issues management. Thus we need to make an effort in this field. When we talk about developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference, we don’t mean that the Muslim Brothers are the Ummah’s representatives in developing the Nahda, but rather that they think, plan, spread awareness and market the idea. The entire Ummah participates in developing its Nahda because the responsibility falls on the shoulder of the Ummah as a whole; cooperation with the entire Ummah in all shades of its spectrum so that we contribute to developing this project however long it takes. This is the first and primary mission, and we said from the beginning that we learned in the Muslim Brotherhood that our mission is to develop the Ummah on the basis of Islamic Reference. [With regards to] this mission, we’ve passed a historical stage; we were establishing the Gama'a, and when we came to focus on it, we were greatly obstructed. Now, the obstacles have been removed, and so we return to the origin; to our natural objective; to our main mission.
We are not making and constituting a Gama'a in order to stay and work only on ourselves and on each other. This is required; but all of this is a means or instrument to develop the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islam, to empower God’s Shari'a, to organize our lives and the lives of all people on the basis of God’s method. Thus this issue requires a great effort in the coming stage, God willing, and as one of the pious businessmen said “he who begins is never late”, meaning that even if we begin with a small effort; [gradually] this effort and work will accumulate so that we establish for the developing of a strong Nahda for our nation on the basis of Islamic Reference. This is the first and primary mission.
Our second mission in this stage is to maintain, to an appropriate level, the vitality of the revolution and maximize its results. Someone says to me “ok so you’re talking about the Ummah’s Nahda, what is the issue’s relationship with the revolution?” I say that what prevented us and the Ummah from developing its Nahda was the autocratic regime. We don’t want the autocracy to return once again. We don’t want someone to incarcerate the Ikhwan or anyone else. We don’t want someone to shut down the institutions we form for the developing of society. For this to happen, the revolution needs to be partially perpetual, and it needs to push for the achievement of as much of its objectives as possible because it hasn’t realized all of them until now. [The revolutionaries] don’t need to come out in the many millions that came out before; this was a situation relevant to the historical event of overthrowing the regime. Rather the appropriate level of at least one or two million should remain so as to keep a guarantee that the current government or any future government commits to the interests of the people, to building a stable political life including peaceful rotation of power, independence of the judiciary, rule of law, security, and attempts to develop the country and people and fix [their] problems. In short a government with which we wouldn’t have a problem and would support. However if it deviated from this path and changed the rule to its own advantage, or that of its [entourage] as was the case with Mubarak, then the people who have awakened must never again sleep.
Therefore part of the vitality of the revolution must continue, and this must become part of our mission in cooperation with the different forces of the people: the improvement of its results, meaning that the revolution right now has achieved some of its results and still has other demands. However, now there is a struggle of many wills. The West is playing in the region. The remnants of the old regime are playing. The current Ruling is dealing with the issue a bit slowly. The people have demands. So all of us must think of how we can help each other in order to maximize the results which we obtain from this great revolution.
Thus we have two fundamental missions. The first mission is to contribute to developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference, and this needs efforts on the planning and formulation level, as well as on the organizational and administrative level. The second mission is to maintain to an appropriate level the vitality of the revolution and maximize its results. These two missions together require of us a third fundamental mission and that is the re-interpretation of the Ikhwani work and developing it so that it is able to undertake these missions in the circumstances and stage in which we are now living, for we agreed that we have [suffered] some negative effects; our structures, bylaws and some of our other aspects were influenced during the period of crackdowns. The circumstances today have changed. The degree of openness is significant. The missions cast upon our shoulders and on the rest of the people are major. It is imperative that we train our Gama'a and ranks, develop, improve and perfect so that we become able to execute the first and second mission. What will we develop? What will we change? We will look in our programs and plans. We will look into the fields of our work because the circumstances have changed today. My programs were relatively limited with regard to the movement with society because of crackdowns. Now things have changed, so we must re-examine my programs for interaction with society.
I was pursuing human development and educational programs that were influenced one way or another by the stage that just passed. Today there are new requirements, so I must reexamine the human development and educational programs that are present around me. We used to educate in a closed atmosphere. Now the world is open, so I must think about changing my ways and means with regard to the educational process. I had structures; these structures were related to my fields of work, meaning that maybe in the period of Imam Al-Banna some of the administrative units in the body of the Ikhwan didn’t exist because the field didn’t exist. For me to say that I will form a section for professionals (white-collars), I need to have work in the field of professionals, so the fields are determined before the structure. I need to revise the fields of work. Are the existing fields of work currently sufficient or do I have an opportunity to add to them or modify the? After that I look at the administrative structures. After I’ve outlined the projects, programs, vision and educational methods, I begin to see whether these structures are appropriate or not. I need to add one, two or three. I need to change, I want to combine. The matter must be looked into.
The last thing we look into is the bylaws; I look what type of amendments my by-laws need, but why are they the last thing, my brothers? It is because the by-laws delineate the relationship between the structure’s units and defines the relationship between individuals inside the structure. It would not work if I have not finished the structure’s units and start speaking about the by-laws, so we always say because of this that the issue of developing is one that has technical rules and a particular arrangement that needs to be dealt with in its way. The first one is to look in the culture and prevailing thoughts, than the long-term projects and strategies, than the intermediate programs, fields of activity and structures, and then the by-laws. Thus what I said just right now entails two issues of utmost importance.
First, when we talk about developing the Ikhwan’s work we talk about developing until we are able to undertake the major missions: cooperation with the people in developing the Ummah’s Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference, and cooperation with the people in preserving an appropriate level of vitality for the revolution and maximizing its results. For I see a lot of Ikhwan who meet me and bring me papers or suggestions. One brother for example was angry that he didn’t make it to the regional council of Muharam Bey [district in Alexandria] in the last elections, as he imagined that with the change and developing that we would amend the bylaw and re-hold elections because he was angry about the composition of the region’s council. Or he didn’t make it to the administrative office, or he didn’t make it in any of the various issues. A Brother is annoyed about a branch official and wants to change him, so his thinking about developing and change is that he wants to solve some of the problems that he’s suffering from.
We don’t have a disagreement in that we must look at the problems, solve them and understand them, but there is a difference if you’re thinking about developing on a big scale since the Gama'a has major tasks that need to be launched in order to realize them, and therefore when you think of developing you think on this level, and between thinking about developing in order to solve a smalr problem of conflict with the head of Family in one Branch, or the Branch Official in one of region. There is a huge difference between the two levels of thinking.
Second, […] developing is a technical process that has rules, and so it’s not possible for a Brother to tell me or presents a suggestion, as soon as he meets me, saying "tomorrow we want to change the by-law", or "tomorrow we want to hold elections for the administrative office in Alexandria", or in the Guidance Bureau or anywhere.
All of this talk is acceptable as suggestions, but the issue requires preparation. Before I speak about amending the by-laws I must have looked at the structures; and before them at the fields of work, and before them at the vision and strategies, and before them at the prevailing culture. The subject needs to be in this order. Therefore we need to realize that the issue will take time.
The third point in developing is that the issue of developing is not the responsibility of one person or one group of people inside the Ikhwan, but rather the responsibility of the Ikhwan as a whole. Why, my brothers? Because you fill different positions inside the Gama'a. When I’m an individual in a family, I see the Ikhwan as an organization and as a method from one angle, when I am a leader of a family I see it from a different angle. When I become a member of a Branch Council, a Branch Official, a member of a Regional Council, or in the Students’ Committee, or the Scouts, or in the Sisters’ Section, the place in which I work always affects the angle of my vision, and perhaps I can see [my part] better than anybody else.
We all see the Ikhwan from different angles; therefore it becomes the duty of every Brother to examine the work he practices and try to answer the question: how can we develop this state? That’s number one, and because he’s part of the Ikhwan as a whole, if he has advice, an opinion or a suggestion for developing the Ikhwan’s work from any other angle he must also say it. For this reason I came to you today to clarify to you, so that you understand and realize the nature of the process of developing. It is a large, wide, and continuous issue, and departs from the philosophy or idea of executing the primary tasks of the Ikhwan’s mission, the two missions which I’ve mentioned. It’s a major issue, not on the level of treating some of the small problems, despite our keenness to solve these problems
The Family thinks, the Branch thinks and writes its particular suggestions on developing. Brothers and Sisters promote these suggestions on all administrative levels; it is required of them that they set aside part of their time and write us ideas and suggestions. Only so that we organize the process and keep it simple, we will submit to you a written questionnaire containing a group of questions specific to the developing process and suggestions. The last question will be an open question, meaning that if we for example asked for your opinion on the developing of the structure, or the by-laws, you would write the part about the by-laws under the question specific to the by-laws, but in the last question we will ask you whether you have any other suggestions for developing because it’s probable that the questions don’t cover all of the ideas you have. So you write all of these ideas, and we will take all of these opinions and suggestions.
This investigation or questionnaire will be sent to you by way of the administrative, regional, branch and family offices God willing, and they will be compiled. Even if this investigation was sent tomorrow or in one week or two and compiled, the door will remain open for the ideas and opinions of any other person who wants to send a suggestion. We put up a web page to collect suggestions, and more than two or three thousand suggestions have now come to me by way of the internet, relevant to the developing of the work, and we’ve actually opened it up to Ikhwan and non-Ikhwan. To Ikhwan because, naturally, this is their Gama'a and they are the ones responsible for developing and improving it, and to non-Ikhwan because we also want to learn how others want to see it, what do they imagine us to be, what do they want? We may find someone with a useful suggestion.
All of these suggestions will be compiled and data in a number of steps and in a number of committees and units that will consider them inside the Gama'a until they are manifested in a program of developing that has priorities, means of execution, and a timetable, and then sent to the different units of the Gama'a in order to execute them in the coming stage.
Therefore, developing on the level of suggestion is the responsibility of all of us, then on the level of execution it is also the responsibility of all of us. It is not the responsibility of the Guidance Bureau nor is that of Engineer Khairat, nor that of one or two, and even the groups of committees that are working on the topic are only there to organize, classify and filter it in order to put in the form of a program to be presented to the institutions of the Gama'a to adopt it and then execute it. Therefore developing is the responsibility of all of us as Ikhwan.
So we want all of the suggestions you all raise through the existing survey or though any other method you see as appropriate after this, through the internet or other. After this developing is not our responsibility only on the intellectual level, but on the level of execution as well, and I want every Brother and Sister from among you to take heed of a lesson regarding our responsibility in this field because, my brothers, we are in a major historical stage in Egypt after the revolution. Thus we must take advantage of this opportunity to develop our Gama'a and push it to the furthest level possible to contribute to Egypt’s salvation, the success of her revolution, and the developing of her Nahda on the basis of Islamic Reference, so that this people and this Ummah may enjoy the life it deserves, and so that we succeed, God willing, in completing our mission related to realizing the objective of Muslim society and Islamic government, launching onto what comes after.
[Break in video…]
Also with is came great media misrepresentation, and there were also attempts to divide the Ikhwan’s ranks and many other means that you all know of. Now, after the diminishing role of security attacks and oppressive procedures, another gulp of media distortion is expected, and you all noticed this to a great extent. So now many of the so-called independent channels and newspapers are starting to exploit all situations to distort our image as Ikhwan, to distort the image of the entire Islamic Movement, and then the entire Islamic perspective on organizing matters of life. I don’t believe that I need to give you evidence of this, because you saw what happened with the constitutional amendments. Had we said “No” to the constitutional amendments they would have attacked us as well, and you saw today that they are exploiting every word and stray opinion here or there and blowing it out of proportion to a great extent as well as distorting [our] statements.
My advice to the Brothers and Sisters first of all is not to be annoyed much by these campaigns because they are inflated and they are trying to misrepresent us to the greatest extent. So we can perhaps be annoyed to the extent that we try to confront them and counter their effects, but let’s not be confused, perplexed or lose confidence in ourselves because this is a natural development; after they lost a number of oppressive means, they’re now focusing to a great degree on media. So first our confidence in God Almighty, then in ourselves, doesn’t sake. No ruse or confusion will work on us. The second issue is that we should not believe everything that is published in these media because they change words, they change statements. They cut and paste so as to misrepresent the image of the Ikhwan and their statements. So let no Brother come to me asking why did someone say this, why did someone do that, because in this you will be assuming the honesty of these media which are unfortunately in many cases dishonest in their campaigns to misrepresent us. So this is one point we need to pay attention to. Of course, as Ikhwan we are now preparing a media strategy, and will gain some of the media outlets which will emerge, God willing, in the coming period. Also, your role is to try and clarify our image with the audience you’re dealing with and [help] people understand the truth.
This God willing is possible because the biggest independent newspaper in Egypt distributes 400 thousand copies. You all participate in society and can reach millions of people, not 400 thousand. Therefore our ability to influence and communicate directly is, God willing, important and effective, in addition to our media outlets which we will try to increase and multiply in the coming stage.
The second point is that, my brothers, we are in a major fundamental transformative stage, and in a nation or a Gama'a that go through such transformative stages there are always many approaches in dealing with the new stage. How do we deal with it? There is no problem that within the body of an organization like the Muslim Brotherhood there be a plurality of visions. On the contrary, this is something natural and desirable; There should be many opinions. What’s important is how we decide upon our differences. We decide through Shura and by adopting the majority opinion because our Shura is binding and not only informative. When it happens that we agree on a subject and the majority ratifies it, most of those in the minority whose opinions were not taken commit to the opinion of the majority and life goes on. However in the current transformative stages, an individual, or two, or five, or ten or twenty might emerge and insist on their vision, their choice and their method deals with the new reality. We try with them once, twice, three or four times as Ikhwan, as representatives for the majority, and if they comply they’re welcome. They’re also welcome not to comply and may God reward them well, and we wish success for them and for us. This is because sometimes good deeds in the service of Islam, Muslims or the homeland, are not all necessarily absolutely right or wrong. I might expect the relative advantages of one way to be 70% compared to that of a second way which might be 50%. Someone else might say the 50% is better and insist on working with it.
So I’m not saying that his way is 100% wrong, and he also has no right to say that my way is 100% wrong. I am trying and I would like that all of us be together as Ikhwan, however if a person or two or three or five want to take another path saying “I don’t agree with the choice of the Gama'a ” or “I don’t agree with the method of this party and I want start a party” or “I want to take another method” or “I have a different opinion”, we pray God Almighty to grant him success without leading to any confusion in our camp. For, my brothers, in major transformative stages this is always a natural issue to emerge. You’ll notice when the 52’ revolution occurred a group of Ikhwan followed their own line; a small number not a large number. In all of the major stages this always happens; so no one is annoyed that x or y resigned, this one took a different line, that one wants to start a party, and that one wants to run in the presidential elections. Every human is free in his choice because a Gama'a is based on voluntary commitment. We chose this path; no one forced it upon us, and if our Lord Almighty said “no compulsion is there in religion” then definitely there is no compulsion in the Muslim Brotherhood’s method. Therefore we deal with the issue in a natural spirit without anything that causes any agitation or confusion or annoyance. Thank God, five, six, ten or twenty; hundreds join the Gama'a daily, so there’s no problem for us in numbers, even if we feel badly if any human being leaves us or walks away from us. What’s important is that if he insists on walking away or taking a choice other than that taken by the majority in the Ikhwan, this does not confuse anyone or not influence you because the criterion for us is the majority and in what the majority of the Gama'a agrees upon; what we believe is the most right even if it is not absolutely right.
In the end of my talk, or the subject I talked about, I apologize for the long-windedness, but once again I reiterate my thanks and joy to meet you all. May God reward you well, and we ask that God Almighty provide for us all salvation to him alone, and fear of him alone, and confidence in him alone, and delegation to him alone. May he grant us success in this world and the next and to make you and us all among the builders of the Nahda of the Ummah on the basis of Islam. God is Great and Praise be to God.
 Ustath ("th" pronounced as in "the", or "z" in Egyptian slang) means mentor, master or simply teacher, as well as the formal way of address for men(Mr.)
 Ikhwani is the adjective form of Ikhwan (Brethren), commonly used to refer to Al-Ikhwan Al-Muslimun (The Muslim Brotherhood).
 Ihsan is the third and highest degree of religiousness, superseding and combining the practice based degree of Islam and the faith-based degree of Iman (belief).
 Pursuing Causes is an important concept in Islamic Creed whose primary function is to resolve the tension between God's Omnipotence and Causality, whereby a Muslim pursues causes but depends on god bringing about the result.
 Ummah will always be transliterated, instead of being rendered as Nation. It could mean either the Egyptian Nation or the Muslim Ummah.
 We have opted for the (Egyptian) transliteration Gama'a to avoid confusion with the various other organizations calling themselves Jama'a, primarily the Egyptian Jama'a Islamiyya. The definite Al- Jama'a can mean both society and the society (as in the Society of the Muslim Brotherhood).
 There is usually no distinction between Islamic and Islamist in Arabic. Islamists usually prefer Islamic since they believe Islamism is synonymous with Islam.
 Nahda isusually translated as Renaissance, which gives it more of a Western flavor than it actually carries. The term Nahda has come to signify "flourishing" or "prosperity", and it is obviously the title of Ustath El-Shater's project.
 Da'wah is a very common concept, generically meaning the preaching and proselytizing of Islam. Here it denotes exclusively Hasan Al-Banna's teachings.
 Empowerment is the closest translation of the key term Tamkeen, which means, basically, upholding Islam by means of political, perhaps military, power. Naturally, the Jurisprudence of Tamkeen is a major issue for all Islamists.
 Subjugation is the English equivalent of the Arabic Ta'beed (to make a slave). The concept, however, does not necessarily involve the use of force; it rather means the theological "liberation of people from slavery to men, to the freedom of slavery to the god of Men".
 Ustathiya is derived from Ustath (See note 1). The term Ustathiya, here used to indicate a status of "eminence among nations" is rarely applied in Hassan El-Banna's own work. It appears only once, in this sense, in his posthumously collected "tracts", widely used as an instructive text for Muslim Brotherhood recruits.
 We use [Repetition…] in places where the speaker repeats his previous arguments with more or less the same wording
 Imam is used here in its original sense meaning Political Leader.
 The addressing form, "ya ikhwanna" (lit. our brothers) is very common in Egyptian slang and usually means "folks", but because of the significance of the term in this context, we decided to render it as "my brothers".
 Shar'i is the adjective from Shari'a
 The term Ulama is now common enough in English not to be rendered as (Islamic) Scholars
 Shura means counsel; it is a key term in the literature of and about Islamism. The basic question is whether Shura is compatible with or substitutable by democracy
 Groups, Families, Branches and Regions are the traditional local units of the Muslim Brotherhood Organization
 This is more of a literal translation of the Arabic Ta'reef, Takween and Tanfeeth ("th" pronounced as in "the", or "z" in Egyptian slang) put forth by Hassan El-Banna in his most influential tract Al-Ta'aleem or The Teachings. There actual meaning is closer to Information (of the public), recruitment (and organization) and implementation (or activism).
 Ghazwah is the Arabic term for a (holy) battle, the use of which is generally confined to the battles which took place during the prophet's lifetime. And Ghazwat Mo'tah was the first Moslem campaign against the Roman (Byzantine) Armies.
 Takfir is attributing Kufr (apostasy) to a Muslim person, community or government on the basis of their actions. The overwhelming majority of scholars hold Kufr to be punishable by death in the case of individuals, but there is little consensus as to whether it is applicable to groups and, if yes, what the proper response to such groups should be. Jihadism emerged as a faction which embraces the possibility of applying Takfir to groups, and considers the fighting of such groups to be justifiable if not desirable Jihad.
 Sultan here could mean either "power" or the head of state.
 Bid'a is perhaps the single most important concept in Salafist Islam, meaning innovation in matters of religion, i.e. practicing rituals or promoting doctrines which were not upheld by the prophet and his companions (the Salaf, or ancestors). Salafists preachers often begin their sermons with the Hadith: "Every novelty is innovation, every innovation is heresy, and every heresy is in hell".
 Saifuddin Qutuz (d 1260) was a Mamluk Sultan of Egypt. He led the Egyptian army to defeat the invading Mongols at Ain Jalut; thereby practically putting an end to the Mongol conquests. Qutuz enjoys a legendary status in contemporary Islamist, Pan-Arabist and Egyptian-Nationalist narratives, second only to that of Saladin.
 Quran (42:38), A. J. Arberry translation.
 Ijtihad is the practice of issuing Fatwas (responsa) or any other
form of ruling without conforming to an already established school of jurisprudence, but within the limitations of Quran and Sunnah. Ijtihad is opposed to both Taqleed (imitation) and Ibtida' (innovation or establishing bid'as, see note 22). Etymologically, however, the term means "exertion of effort" or "diligence", and in many cases the term carries both meanings.
 Mujtahid is the scholar who applies Ijtihad
 Just Despot is a very common concept that was formulated by Muhammad Abduh as a local variation of Enlightened Absolutism.
 Umar El-Tilmisani (d. 1986) was the third General Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood; famous for the deal or "understanding" he had with President Sadat concerning the return of the Muslim Brotherhood to social activism, especially in universities to counter the influence of Nasserist and Communist students.
 Mustafa Mashhur(d. 2002) was the fifth General Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood.
 Ahmed El-Malt (d. 1995) was Deputy General Guide of the Muslim Brotherhood under Umar El-Tilmisani, Mohammed Hamed Abul Nasr and Mustafa Mashhur. He participated in the 1948 Palestine War as a volunteer doctor.
 Hosni Abdel-Baqi (d. 1990) was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood Guidance Bureau since 1948. He won a seat for the MB in the first open parliamentary elections in 1984.
 Abbass As-Sissi (d. 2004) was a member of the Guidance Bureau of the Muslim Brotherhood who enjoyed a great reputation in Alexandria as one of the MB's most famous preachers
 Mahmoud Shukri (d. 2010) was head of the Muslim Brotherhood Administrative Office in Alexandia, and one of the founders of Dar El-Dawah, the MB's largest publishing house.
 Mohammed Hussein Issa is a Muslim Brotherhood leading preacher in Alexandria
 The Salsabil Case was the first case of mass arrestl for Muslim Brotherhood members since the sixties. Salsabil was the name of a Computer Software company founded by Khairat El-Shater himself, along with his longtime partner Hassan Malek, that was allegedly working on an MB plan to take over government in Egypt. The case was a government failure on both legal and publicity fronts, but El-Shater spent a year in prison.
 Quran (2:256) A. J. Arberry Translation
The End of the Inspire Era
The End of the Inspire Era
May 3, 2012
Al-Qaida has released two new issues of its English-language magazine eight months after a drone strike eliminated the American jihadi leaders behind it. The latest editions of Inspire magazine reinforce al-Qaida's promotion of lone wolf attacks, but each is aimed at a very different audience.
Inspire was known for cultivating English-language jihadis, contributing to more than a dozen plots against American and Western targets. The sophisticated magazine combined all the elements necessary to motivate would-be terrorists, from the justifying theology to detailed suggestions for new attacks in the West. It was also critical for al-Qaida's shift from large, top down directed attacks to small, individualistic terror.
The newly-released eighth issue carrying the cover headline, "Targeting Dar al-Harb Populations," promotes the lone wolf trend for non-Muslim lands in the same way as previous editions. It details plans for new attack methods in the "Open Source Jihad" section, and presents the culmination of American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki's justification for killing American civilians.
But the ninth issue, "Winning on the Ground," reads more like an address to Western audiences and the moderate Muslims that al-Qaida despises. It was written after Awlaki and Inspire editor Samir Khan – a fellow American – were killed in the September U.S. drone strike.
Although it contains suggestions to burn down Western forests and cities, it spends more time eulogizing fallen fighters like Awlaki and trying to explain al-Qaida's ideology to outsiders. Its quality is noticeably worse without Khan, lacking the polished style and graphics of previous editions, and is further limited by contradictory articles and barely readable translations.
The difference between the two magazines is striking, and perhaps hints at the new direction for future al-Qaida English-language publications.
Issue 8's update in the "Open Source Jihad" series reinforces Inspire's hallmark methods of lone wolf terrorism by showing how to use small handguns and to build remote-controlled detonators for explosives. This effort clearly builds on articles from previous issues, like "How to Build a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom."
Its ideological articles also mirror those in previous issues. In a lengthy feature article, "Targeting the Populations of Countries that Are at War with the Muslims," Awlaki lays out his most sophisticated argument for killing American civilians.
Such arguments arguably are his most important contribution to al-Qaida's ideological longevity. This role was so important that Osama bin Laden called him "qualified and capable of running the matter in Yemen," according to documents captured from bin Laden's compound after his assassination.
In "Targeting the Populations of Countries that Are at War with the Muslims," Awlaki argued that Islam's prohibition against killing civilians doesn't hold up for modern-day Westerners.
"… In no way does it mean that Islam prohibits the fighting against the disbelievers if their men, women and children are intermingled. This understanding is very dangerous and detrimental to jihad and awareness on this issue is very important," he wrote. "To stop the targeting of disbelievers who are at war with the Muslims just because there are women and children among them leads to constraints on today's jihad that make it very difficult, and at times, impossible to fight and places the Muslims at a great disadvantage compared to their enemy."
Although it was intended to be released last fall, most of the issue's ideological material remains relevant and dangerous.
In "Blended Duality: Muslim and American?" Khan argued that being Muslim and American are inherent contradictions.
"To say one is proud of being American is not merely a cultural declaration but one of allegiance," he wrote. Being American is "to undertake that which Allah detests," and all attempts to create a "moderate" Islam are just "Muslims throwing the Qur'an behind their backs."
Would-be warriors should help al-Qaida create a real Islamic state instead, and throw off the shackles of Western secularism, he argued.
The ninth issue looks and reads like a different publication, complete with notes explaining Islamic terminology to the uninitiated. It also presents contradictory arguments about what al-Qaida really wants and who it is willing to kill to get there.
Khan's final testament is published in the issue. He initially portrays al-Qaida's fight as a defensive battle against American hegemony, which will ultimately lead to a renewed Islamic Caliphate that will defend Muslims. "As long as they continue to kill our people, occupy our lands, support Israel, fund the tyrannical puppets in the Muslim lands and try to re-interpret Islam, we will punish them and their nation severely," Khan wrote.
But in the article, "This is How We Win and This is How You Lose," Abu Hurairah as-Sana'ani states that al-Qaida's fight is about offensive domination of non-Muslims. "So contemplate… perhaps you [will be] guided to Islam, recognizing it as sovereign over you and give the jizyah willingly while you are humbled," he wrote, referring to the obligatory tax on non-Muslims living under Islamic supremacy.
While Khan and as-Sana'ani's arguments are essentially two sides of the same coin, each promoting the victory of Islam and the defeat of the West, they clash in explaining why al-Qaida is fighting.
Similar contradictions exist in the issue's approach to killing civilians.
In "They Killed Father, They Killed Son," writer Um Ahmed takes issue with separate drone strikes killing Awlaki and his eldest son. "One should wonder what Obama will do, what Obama would feel if Muslims kill his daughters only for being his daughters? We are sure that not only the Americans but the whole world would condemn such murder," she wrote. "But Muslims would never intentionally killed (sic) children, no matter who their parents are. No matter if they are the worst enemy of Islam, if they are children it is prohibited to target them intentionally."
But 20 pages later, the article "Do the Mujahideen and Christian terrorist have similar goals?" celebrates a recent terror attack by an al-Qaida wannabe in France. In March, French terrorist Mohammed Merah viciously murdered three young Jewish children and a rabbi on their way to school, chasing them down and killing them execution-style.
The same article states that al-Qaida terrorists "do not deliberately target women and children," but refers to the deliberate murder of all civilians as entirely justified revenge.
"If someone says that our bombings in London and Madrid, for example, are proof that we target women and children, then we say that we purposely target specialized institutions to not only send political messages, but to damage their economies, and [do] revenge for the Muslims they have massacred over the years by repeating the same to their own citizens so that they may taste what we taste on a near daily basis," the author claimed.
He concedes that, "Our war with America and the West may appear to some that we are out to kill for the sake of killing, since all we do to them is just that. The reason behind it is – as we've previously stated – because of the crimes these governments have perpetrated on our lands and continue to perpetrate."
Other themes in the ninth issue contradict either prominent articles from previous issues or al-Qaida's standard operating procedures.
"The Jihadi Experiences: The Most Important Enemy Targets Aimed at by the Individual Jihad," calls for striking Jews but not synagogues or other places of worship. That goes against the entire third edition of Inspire, which promoted an attempted mail bombing attack on two Jewish houses of worship.
The article also warns against targeting civilians not involved in conflict with Muslims, and advises individual attackers to be sensitive to al-Qaida's reputation. That point doesn't jibe with the policy of al-Qaida's North African and Yemeni branches, which have regularly kidnapped and executed foreign tourists.
The new Inspire issues represent different expressions of al-Qaida's message, and alternative summaries of Inspire magazine's legacy. Like past editions, they are likely to remain highly relevant to future plots, and may provide fertile ideological ground for the next generation of al-Qaida propaganda.
Where are the cries of outrage and the demonstrations in the streets against this terrorist group that supposedly perverts Islam’s message from the “moderate Muslims” ???
Whitewashing Islam in Public Schools
Whitewashing Islam in Public Schools
CLICK HERE to download a PDF of this document: Education or Indoctrination – The Treatment of Islam in 6th – 12th grade American textbooks.
Maryland Man Pleads Guilty in Terror Plot
Maryland Man Pleads Guilty in Terror Plot
by Abha Shankar • May 4, 2012
A Maryland teenager of Pakistani origin pleaded guilty Friday to conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists. Mohammad Hassan Khalid, 18, was charged in October along with Algerian-born Ali Charaf Damache, aka "The blackflag" in connection with a scheme to support, recruit, and coordinate a terrorist cell to wage violent jihad in Europe.
"Today's plea, which involved a radicalized teen in Maryland who connected with like-minded individuals around the globe via the Internet, underscores the evolving nature of violent extremism today," Lisa Monaco, Assistant Attorney General for National Security, said in a Justice Department press release.
Court records show that Khalid and Damache conspired with Colleen R. LaRose (also known as "Jihad Jane"), Jamie Paulin Ramirez, and others to develop "a violent jihad organization … divided into a planning team, a research team, an action team, a recruitment team, and a finance team, some of whom would travel to South Asia for explosives training and return to Europe to wage violent jihad."
LaRose pleaded guilty in February 2011 to plotting to kill a Swedish cartoonist and to recruiting people to wage terrorist attacks. She faces up to life in prison. Ramirez pleaded guilty the following month to one count of conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists.
In addition to recruiting jihadist online, Khalid and others also solicited funds for terrorists and recruited women who could use Western passports to travel to Europe in support of their jihadi objectives.
In a July 2009 electronic communication Damache suggested to Khalid that their group train "either with AQIM [Al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb] or ISI [Islamic State of Iraq]" in their efforts to become "a professional organized team." Damache further instructed Khalid to recruit online "some brothers that can travel freely … with eu passports …. [A]nd i also need some sisters too." He also told Khalid that "sister fatima [Colleen LaRose] will be in charge of other sister care … [W] e have already organized everything for her…. [W]e are will[ing] to die in order to protect her no matter what the risk is."
According to the plea memorandum, Khalid sought money online to support terrorism on behalf of LaRose. He then helped delete her online posts espousing jihad after the FBI interviewed her. Khalid also sent an electronic questionnaire to a woman asking her about her beliefs and intentions about violent jihad. He forwarded the questionnaire to LaRose and asked her to confirm if her "brothers" are "REAL mujahids."
Khalid faces a maximum 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Damache is being held in Ireland where he is being prosecuted on a separate, unrelated charge.
Baruch college msa asks student government to pay for imam(new york)
Baruch College MSA Asks Student Government to Pay for Imam(New York)
Muslim Berate Western Culture for Allowing “uncovered white meat” (women) in public
Muslim Berate Western Culture for Allowing “uncovered white meat”
(women) in public
Canada: Islamic school under investigation for teaching Islamic antisemitism
Canada: Islamic school under investigation for teaching Islamic antisemitism
An article from IslamOnline (posted several years ago and since taken down, but captured here) shows that this Toronto Islamic school was teaching standard Qur'anic Islam:
Dear Sheikh! As-Salam `Alaykum. What, according to the Qur’an, are the main characteristics and qualities of Jews?Answer: [...] As regards the question you posed, the following is the fatwa issued by Sheikh `Atiyyah Saqr, former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, in which he states the following:So if this Islamic school is under investigation for mainstream Islamic teaching, what about the other Islamic schools?
"Islamic school under investigation for teachings about Jews," by Terry Davidson for the Toronto Sun, May 7:
TORONTO - Police are investigating an east-Toronto Islamic school following a complaint it had been teaching its young students that Jews are “treacherous” and comparable to Nazis.Busy crafting a line to fool the kuffar.
Jamal Badawi: Enduring Link to ISNA's Radical Past
Jamal Badawi: Enduring Link to ISNA's Radical Past
May 8, 2012
For an organization that has tried to distance itself from its Muslim Brotherhood roots, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) continues to rely on a Muslim Brotherhood official as a key speaker at many of its events.
Jamal Badawi is scheduled to speak during three sessions at ISNA's East Regional Conference in Tampa this weekend. Among them, "Understanding Shari'ah: Sacred Principles in Striving for the Human Development."
Badawi, a member at large on ISNA's governing board, is deeply rooted in the Muslim Brotherhood's North American infrastructure, records show. He is listed on the first page of a 1992 telephone directory of Brotherhood members. He also was founding member of the Muslim American Society (MAS), identified as the Brotherhood's U.S. arm in a 2004 Chicago Tribune story.
"Everyone knows that MAS is the Muslim Brotherhood," Abdurrahman Alamoudi testified in a Virginia courtroom last month. Alamoudi, once the nation's most influential Muslim political figure, acknowledges his own Brotherhood involvement.
Brotherhood members also created ISNA in 1981 as an outgrowth of the Muslim Students' Association.
The Brotherhood, founded in Egypt in 1928, has surged to power in recent Egyptian elections and has a global Islamic state, or Caliphate, as its ultimate goal. Its American arm cited an educational program Badawi ran in 1991 as a foundation for "dawa," or proselytizing, in America. That same document described the Brotherhood's work in America as "a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."
Badawi's comments over the years show he views Islam as superior to democracy and that he defends violent jihad, including suicide bombings, as a form of martyrdom. Such statements, in addition to his Brotherhood connections, make it difficult for ISNA to claim that it has shed its radical past and MB ties.
During a February 2009 speech on "Understanding Jihad and Martyrdom," at the Chebucto Mosque in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Badawi explained that Gaza-based terrorists were fighting a jihad and that those who were killed were martyrs. He railed against those who criticized the terrorists or cooperated with the Israelis, saying that it was an 'excess' by more moderate Muslims to come out against their brothers fighting the Jewish state.
"One of those form of excesses is that noble mujahideen, those who strive in the path of Allah, who are really worthy of the term Shuhadaa – martyrs – have been attacked or accused [of being terrorists], not only by their enemies, but by those who are amongst the people who are included in the broader description of the Ummah," he said.
"They [moderate Muslims] made this accusation, but they did not even stop at accusations, they did cooperate with the enemies of humanity, to kill their own brothers and sisters," he added, stating that those that fought against Muslims were "sub-contracting, on behalf of the usurpers of Muslims' land, right, and heritage."
Badawi also explained that the Western media was guilty of hypocrisy when it referred to Gaza "martyrs" fighting the Israelis, as terrorists. "In the Western world, however, we find that the media, which is both misled and misleading, and those who are behind that media, they continued also to falsify and distort this noble concept of martyrdom, equating it with what they call terrorism, fanaticism, violence, and so on," he said.
The Western media readily agrees that someone who "or prefers death in defense of some value, of some cause," that is a good thing. However, "when that choice is that of a Muslim, and he chooses death rather than weakness, rather than accepting aggression and selling their rights, no, no, no, that doesn't apply here," he said.
Badawi spoke again in support of Palestinian terror a year later.
"But there is one form of combative jihad that is permissible only for self-defense against unprovoked aggression or to resist severe oppression, such as people being driven from their homes like the Palestinians and dispossessed," he said in a March 2010 speech posted to the Islamonline.net website.
In June 2006, he led an Islamonline.net dialogue session called "Martyrdom in Islam: Let's Discuss it." In it, he compared suicide bombers fighting oppression to "freedom fighters" fighting the Nazis or the Japanese kamikazes fighting the Americans. At a 1999 Muslim student conference held at the University of Maryland, Badawi said that "resistance" was really an act of heroism. "So when an act of heroism like that is required to save others it is self-sacrifice you cannot really call it suicide. What Islam condemns is suicide in the negative sense. That's my understanding."
He likened Palestinian attacks on Israeli soldiers to the French resistance against the Nazis and urged people not to wilt in the face of criticism of such violence.
"But what makes me really surprised is the intimidation in the media and by politicians that you people, not Arabs, not Muslims even, who know of this hypocrisy are not speaking up for fear of being branded as oh supporters of terrorism," he said at the University of Maryland conference. This is childish. This is childish. This we should not support terrorism by victimizing the innocent people but we should support freedom fighters anywhere who have been wronged."
He also has openly questioned whether Islam and democracy are compatible. "The Qur'an and Prophetic tradition are the ultimate constitution," he wrote in 2004.
Because Islam was given by God, "It's not something that anyone can update or change or supersede in any way; it is free from error or else, of course, there wouldn't be any belief in God. On the other hand, other systems, whether they are democracy, socialism, or otherwise, are man-made ideas or ideologies."
The practical effect of that attitude came during the 2006 controversy surrounding the publication of Danish cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad. Badawi compared the publication to Holocaust denial, arguing it was beyond the limits of free speech.
"'When you depict a great prophet . . . of one-fifth of humankind as a terrorist, that goes beyond satire, that goes beyond insults, that goes beyond offence," Badawi said in a Canadian Press Wire story. "This is nothing but a hate message. You can't hide behind freedom of expression, freedom of the press or academic freedom to preach hate against groups of people."
During a MAS conference in Los Angeles the same year, Badawi preached that democracy falls short of what Islam offers. It is "not only for the problems of any particular society, America or otherwise but the solution for the world…. And we believe that Islam is the only solution not only to the problems of America but to the malaise of the world at large."
ISNA is active in interfaith outreach and has been embraced by government officials as a voice of moderation for Muslim Americans. But the continued prominence of someone with a record of radical connections and views as deep as Badawi's history raises legitimate concerns over the organization's commitments to peace and democracy.
Last edited by Paparock; 05-09-2012 at 03:10 PM..
'75%' of Arabic Facebook Posts Express 'Radical Beliefs'
A growing number of Wahhabi Muslims in Saudi Arabia are now expressing their radical views on social media sites like Facebook, according to a new study.
The Foundation for Defense of Democracies scanned about 40,000 Arabic and English posts on Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, message boards, and similar sites from January to June 2011.
Wahhabi Muslim clerics are using Facebook and other sites to push extreme anti-Western views.
"A staggering 75 percent of the Arabic-language posts we saw reflected xenophobic beliefs, or hostility toward the United States, the West, and non-Muslim cultures," FDD Vice President for Research Jonathan Schanzer said.
The "Facebook Fatwa" findings counter claims from the Saudi government that leaders are working to counter radical Wahhabi beliefs.
CBN News spoke with FDD research associate and study co-author Steve Miller more about the findings. Click play for his comments on how the culture among Wahhabi Muslims is changing and how this could impact the U.S.
Read the entire study here.
& Here> http://www.defenddemocracy.org/stuff...book_Fatwa.pdf
Arab-Americans stand up for honor killing
Arab-Americans stand up for honor killing
In "Arab-Americans stand up for honor killing" in WND, May 8, Pamela Geller counters the charge that our Jessica Mokdad Human Rights Conference barred Arab Americans. Our video response to the Islamic supremacist smear video that charged this is above.
Our AFDI/SIOA Jessica Mokdad Human Rights conference on April 29 in Dearborn, Mich., was the first conference of its kind, dedicated to increasing awareness of honor killings and gendercide under the Shariah. But in the aftermath of the highly successful conference, Arab-American and Muslim groups continue to attack us instead of focusing on the real problem: the victimization of girls in the Muslim community.There are videos going around by Islamic supremacists such as the pro-honor killing “journalist” Omar Baddar, new media coordinator at the Arab American Institute (AAI), claiming that they were refused entry to the Jessica Mokdad Human Rights Conference because they were Arabs and Muslims.Read it all.
"Mainstream" Islamist Group Attacks Law Enforcement and Whitewashes Jihadists
"Mainstream" Islamist Group Attacks Law Enforcement and Whitewashes Jihadists
May 14, 2012
Few organizations in the United States have been as consistent in attacking law enforcement as the Muslim Public Affairs Council and its president, Salam al-Marayati.
Marayati, who attended last year's White House Iftar Dinner during Ramadan, has suggested that Muslim Americans are at war with both al-Qaeda and the FBI. "We in the Muslim American community have been battling the corrupt and bankrupt ideas of cults such as Al Qaeda," he wrote in October in the Los Angeles Times." Now it seems we also have to battle pseudo-experts in the FBI and the Department of Justice."
Marayati was incensed over reports that the FBI and one U.S. Attorney's office had used training materials "revealing a deep anti-Muslim sentiment within the U.S. government." One example was a 2010 presentation by an analyst working for a U.S. Attorney in Pennsylvania which warned of a civilizational jihad that is "waged today in the U.S. by 'civilians, juries, lawyers, media, and charities'" who "threaten our values."
Marayati warned that if U.S. law enforcement continues to use such "incorrect and divisive" literature, the "partnership" between Muslim Americans and law enforcement "will slowly disintegrate."
"Such baseless and inflammatory claims shall best be left to those few who share Al Qaeda's agenda," Marayati wrote. "In other words, the rhetoric of Al Qaeda and those law enforcement trainers are opposite sides of the same coin of hate."
But the concept of civilization-jihad is not something conjured up by a consultant as a pretext to oppress Muslims. During the 2008 Hamas-financing prosecution of five former officials of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), FBI Agent Lara Burns testified about a 1991 internal memorandum outlining the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood-connected "Palestine Committee" which was created to advance the Hamas agenda in the United States.
"The process of settlement is a 'Civilization-Jihadist Process' with all the word means," the memo read. "The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."
The five HLF officials were convicted on all charges by a federal jury in Dallas and sentenced to long prison terms.
Despite its long record of attacking law enforcement efforts to protect the American people from jihadist violence, MPAC has gained influence within the Obama administration. The group's Washington office director, Haris Tarin, has frequently attended White House events, including its Iftar Dinner last Ramadan and President Obama's 9/11 Memorial at the Kennedy Center. In July, Obama personally telephoned Tarin to commend him for MPAC's work.
And in recent months, MPAC, working in tandem with other Islamist organizations, has repeatedly pushed in order to bend U.S. government policies to its will.
In February, MPAC joined the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and other groups in meeting with FBI Director Robert Mueller to discuss purportedly anti-Muslim materials in Bureau training manuals.
MPAC's website linked to an article which said the FBI had destroyed hundreds of terrorism documents in an effort to root out "Islamophobia." The purged materials included articles and PowerPoint presentations defining jihad as "holy war" and describing the Brotherhood's efforts to achieve world domination.
In April, MPAC and Muslim Advocates sprung into action after White House counterterrorism advisor John Brennan expressed "his full confidence that the NYPD is doing things consistent with the law, and it's something that again has been responsible for keeping this city safe over the past decade."
MPAC responded to Brennan's statement with a call for "immediate public clarification" along with a threat. Much as Marayati did in the Los Angeles Times op-ed cited above, Tarin suggested Muslims would cease cooperating with law enforcement if surveillance policies were not changed to MPAC's satisfaction.
"There are plenty of robust partnership models that both communities and the government have invested in and those partnerships will be jeopardized if NYPD's current tactics are not halted, and its programs are not adjusted to more successful initiatives," Tarin warned.
Four days after MPAC laid down the law, the Obama administration caved and issued a clarification of Brennan's comments. The counterterrorism chief had "never approved of described press accounts of alleged NYPD surveillance," a White House official said.
In earlier comments praising the police department, Brennan "wasn't referring to the NYPD surveillance" that had come under attack from Islamist groups like MPAC and Muslim Advocates, the official added. "Rather, he was stating that everyone in the counterterrorism and law enforcement community must make sure we are doing things consistent with the law."
Non-Islamist Muslims like Zuhdi Jasser, founder and president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy are a top target of MPAC attacks.
A first-generation American Muslim whose parents fled Syria's Ba'athist dictatorship in the 1960s, Jasser served 11 years as a U.S. Navy medical officer. He believes that the jihadist terror threat cannot be addressed without addressing the role of "political Islam" as practiced by groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
Jasser has called on Muslims to oppose people like Muslim Brotherhood-linked cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who has said it is permissible to kill apostates, and Jamal Badawi of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), who has said apostates should be "punished." According to Jasser, the jihadists won't be defeated until Muslims start to realize that they are on a "slippery slope" toward radicalism.
This kind of talk has earned Jasser the enmity of groups like MPAC, which sent out a March "action alert" urging supporters to protest his appointment to the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), calling it "an affront to all Muslims." The group directed its Twitter followers to a petition circulated by Islamist groups, copying its claim that "Zuhdi Jasser does not belong on the USCIRF."
While it treats fellow Muslim Americans like Jasser with contempt and works to marginalize them, MPAC is frequently deferential to rogue states and terrorists.
Last month, it reposted an article suggesting that convicted terrorist Tarek Mehanna was only exercising his freedom of speech when he translated and posted al-Qaida recruitment videos, and that Muslims have the right to kill American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. The article, published in Britain's Guardian newspaper, was linked from MPAC's Twitter feed and Facebook page.
The writer, Marine veteran Ross Caputi, argues that Mehanna, "is being punished for his ideas, and the case against him stinks of a lynch-mob mentality." Describing Mehanna, now serving a 17-year prison term, as a "victim" of a " hysterical witch-hunt for 'radical' Muslims," Caputi agrees with the convicted terrorist "that much of what the US military has done in Iraq and Afghanistan can be characterized as terrorism, and I support Afghans and Iraqis who fight back against us."
In February, MPAC reposted on its Twitter and Facebook pages an article in which Iran's repressive regime gloated over the fact that an Iranian film won an Oscar, defeating an Israeli film in the same category.
In a Feb. 29 appearance on Russia Today's Cross Talk program, al-Marayati depicted Iran (which is flouting international law with its illicit nuclear-weapons program) as the victim in the current diplomatic crisis.
"With other countries, we utilize the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), we use multilateral instruments to deal with the nuclear problem," al-Marayati said. "In this case with Iran, there is no dialogue, there is (sic) no negotiations , it is all confrontational policies that is part of a war-mongering mentality here in the U.S. and they're just waiting for the tripwire and then the machinery of war will begin."
Al-Marayati also suggested that the United States was in trouble for doing "dirty work" for Israel.
"The other point here, which is very important historically, the United States has done a lot of dirty work that has served the interests of Israel," he said. "It destroyed Iraq. It supported the destruction and crippling of Egypt. It has crippled the Gulf. And now, it is looking to Iran as the next target for crippling and destroying. I think this is madness. Who is driving our foreign policy? President Obama or Prime Minister Netanyahu?"
MPAC officials have also appeared on Press TV, the Iranian regime's English-language propaganda outlet, at least six times since November 2010, always criticizing U.S. government policies or complaining about the plight of Muslims in the U.S.
MPAC has a history of excusing terrorist attacks against Americans and questioning U.S. government actions against terrorists and their financiers.
In a 1999 paper, it called Hizballah's bombing of U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, in which more than 280 American servicemen were killed as they slept, "a military operation, producing no civilian casualties – exactly the kind of attack that Americans might have lauded had it been directed against Washington's enemies." Other MPAC policy papers have criticized the presence of Hizballah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad on the U.S. list of terror groups.
MPAC questioned Washington's targeting of U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaida ideologue and facilitator of attacks against America. After Awlaki was killed in a Sept. 30 drone strike, MPAC rejected his message of violence while questioning his killing "without a trial and due process."
In 2001, MPAC blasted the Treasury Department for designating the HLF for its Hamas fundraising activities. It accused Washington of "taking food out of the mouths of Palestinian orphans" and "succumbing to politically-motivated smear campaigns by those who would perpetuate Israel's brutal occupation."
At a MPAC's December 2010 annual conference, senior MPAC official Maher Hathout portrayed critics of radical Islam as "Muslim bashers." Ignoring a slew of homegrown terror plots targeting the United States that year, Hathout tried to whitewash the connection between jihad and violence – even though terrorists themselves invoke Islam to justify their violent jihad.
"I am so protective of the word and concept of jihad," Hathout said. "We define what jihad is, not anyone else, and jihad has nothing to do with what they are talking about."
He made this comment shortly after Awlaki took to the pages of al-Qaida's Inspire magazine to argue that Western Muslims must wage violent jihad in order to topple non-believers.
CAIR Officials Demonize America on Iranian TV
CAIR Officials Demonize America on Iranian TV
by IPT News • May 15, 2012
Two officials representing the Council on American-Islamic Relations' New York chapter (CAIR-NY) turned to an Iranian television station this week in order to propagate the dangerous and oft-repeated narrative that the U.S. is at war with Islam and hostile to Muslims.
The narrative—said to be one of the most potent tools in recruiting Muslims to violent jihad—was first put forth by CAIR-NY head Zead Ramadan in an interview Monday with Iranian state-controlled Press TV. During the discussion, Ramadan compared the situation of Muslims in America to that of Jews under Nazi rule.
"In Nazi Germany, they targeted the minority, the Jewish minority," Ramadan told Press TV by phone. "I don't think we will ever get there, but I don't think we should allow the road to continue to be built towards that direction because the comments that are being made against Muslims are very eerily echoing the comments that were being made against Jews by Nazis."
The steady increase in anti-Muslim rhetoric can largely be blamed upon "election season" in general Ramadan said, but in particular, Republicans should be seen as the primary offender.
"[W]henever you think that America, the land of the free, is going to grow up and go beyond it [racism], more intolerant, extremist voices come out," Ramadan lamented. "And the easiest target, the minority, the easiest target has been the Muslim people.
"Every time there is an election cycle, some people like Newt Gingrich, Santorum, and even Mitt Romney had made very negative comments about Muslims and that makes people think that if someone is running for president, he could make negative comments and he is spreading negative rhetoric about Muslims… I think it's very dangerous," he added.
Ramadan's message cannot be brushed off as a personal rant of one rogue leader. Just one day earlier, a similar theme was echoed by fellow CAIR-NY official, Cyrus McGoldrick, to the very same Iranian outlet.
In the Sunday interview, McGoldrick, the group's Civil Rights Manager, accused the FBI of using "tremendous resources" to demonize Muslim Americans and of not spending a "fraction" of the amount on real security measures.
They are using "tremendous resources, tremendous resources to spy on Muslims, to demonize Muslims, and to entrap Muslims. I think it would be great if they spent a fraction of that money, protecting Muslims and all American citizens," McGoldrick said.
Because of this, "the real American ideals are now being lost," he concluded.
Strangely absent in McGoldrick's comments about ideals is a discussion of how minorities are treated in Press TV's state-sponsor, Iran, and how treatment of Muslims in America compares to that of ethnic minorities elsewhere.
Such realities have never stopped CAIR from routinely taking to the channel to promote the "America is against Muslims" narrative. They join a group of fringe academics, far left activists, and Islamist extremists who agree with the Islamic Republic's propaganda about the so-called Western and Zionist "War on Islam."
New Freedom Center Video — “Muslim Brotherhood in America”
New Freedom Center Video — “Muslim Brotherhood in America”
Freedom Center pamphlet exposes the Islamist networks infiltrating the U.S
The Freedom Center pamphlet “Muslim Brotherhood in America,” written by Robert Spencer, one of the foremost experts on Islam, exposes the history, growth and pro-terror agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood network in the United States. Watch the video below for more information and order your copy of the pamphlet by clicking here.
‘Marxist’ Muslim: Obama Has ‘White Man’s Guilt’ & Sharia ‘Has No Place In Islam’
Popular Canadian ‘Marxist’ Muslim: Obama Has ‘White Man’s Guilt’ & Sharia ‘Has No Place In Islam’
by Billy Hallowell
Canadian political activist, author, columnist and practicing Muslim Tarek Fatah has been described as a liberal Marxist who stands firmly opposed to radicalism Islam. While he disagrees vehemently with American conservatives when it comes to the economy, he may surprise you when it comes to fighting radical Islam.
Recently, The Blaze interviewed Fatah, delving deeply into his views about President Barack Obama, the American left and the ongoing need to fight extremism.
You may recall our coverage last year of his address at Canada’s Ideacity conference. During his speech, the practicing Muslim bravely proclaimed that “the religion of Islam is being used as a tool by a fascist force.”
Additionally, he made some bold claims about the American government.
“Instead of bringing victory over the fascist forces of the Muslim Brotherhood, we now recognize that their infiltration is right up to the American White House, but we can’t say that,” he proclaimed. “Today we are fighting another idea of Islamo-fascism that has shut our mouths and we can’t speak because we’re too scared that someone may turn around and call us a racist. And mind you, everyday as I speak, a few dozen Muslims would have been killed by now by these Jihadis.”
In his interview with The Blaze, Fatah doubled down on these words, leaving no stone unturned in ensuring that those paying attention understand the horrific implications of radical Islamism. Fighting extremism, he said, shouldn’t be a partisan undertaking.
THE LEFT’S FAILURES
“During the entire Cold War you didn’t have to be liberal or conservative to recognize a threat communism was [posing],” he said. “It’s a pity that the new sort of fascism that America — the West faces — has not produced some sort of recognition in liberal circles of this…the left in the U.S. has betrayed every single position that they’ve ever stood for.”
On the issues of racism, slavery and women’s and gay rights, Fatah said that the American life suffers from a “heavy dose of white guilt.” Later in the interview, he mirrored this sentiment, charging, “Right now the tragedy is — Barack Obama seems to be the first black person with a white man’s guilt.”
When it comes to addressing specific policy issues, the activist claims the left has simply become ideologically-driven. When a conservative takes a position, for instance, liberals, he claims, automatically adopt the opposing view. In essence, the commentator maintains that such a mentality leaves American liberals in a position where they are “shooting themselves in the foot” and potentially moving in a direction that could be dangerous to the nation.
Fatah also told The Blaze about his view that America, despite leftist claims, is a beacon of democracy. The U.S., he believes, is a country that provides more “social justice” (i.e. senior care, free education, trade union rights and numerous other freedoms) than practically any other “society on earth.”
FIGHTING ISLAMIC EXTREMISM
Among the other issues that Fatah has been passionate about is the ongoing quest to combat radical Islam. Despite his leftist economic views, the commentator is intent about the West’s need to stand up and strongly resists extremism.
Just as he did during his Ideacity address, Fatah condemned the treatment of radical Islam in the West. Rather than confronting the issue as they should, he lamented liberals’ political correctness that, often times, dictates how the issue is discussed.
The Muslim Brotherhood — a group that is re-emerging and capturing power in nations across the world — is one that he has heavily criticized. In fact, he sees the radical cohort as a major danger that must be rationally examined and combated. Recently, the group has emerged as a powerful force in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria and Libya, among other countries. Dealing with opposition to the Brotherhood is particularly difficult among members of Fatah’s own community.
“Anyone opposed to the Muslim Brotherhood in the Muslim community is shut out,” he said. “If you’re critical of the NYPD, if you’re critical of American policies, you can be invited to the White House by White House officials but if you are supportive of American values and the separation of religion and state and an opponent of the Muslim Brotherhood you’re shut out. That’s the reality.”
Watch him discussing the Brotherhood in an interview last year:
The commentator, who claims he initially supported Obama, said the president has left him “terribly disappointed.” This is particularly true when considering how the administration has purportedly allowed Islamist influence to seep in. And that, he said, must be confronted, as there are specific steps that he contends must be taken in order to combat Islamic extremism.
“[The West] has to launch a very ideological war and weed out all the academics in the American universities who support the Muslim Brotherhood and have taken over all of the Islamic studies departments,” Fatah contended. “And Islamism 101 should be a mandatory course in Georgetown University, in Howard and in all the Ivy League schools and anti-Muslim Brotherhood academics should be invited to teach.”
Allowing such pervasive ideals to enter the university system leads to indoctrination and a diminished ability to properly alert young people and adults, alike, to the worldly dangers that exist.
“We’ve ended up [in] a situation that the only people teaching American diplomats about how to fight Islamism are the ones who have sympathy with our enemy,” he said. ”I keep repeating one thing — you can fight Malaria by killing mosquitoes. You’ve got to drain the swamps.”
THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD & THE WHITE HOUSE
As for the Obama White House, Fatah explained that, though it may be unintentional and/or sophisticated work by the Muslim Brotherhood, the White House may be near one of these swamps. The Brotherhood, he said, has a powerful ability to embed itself in political structures.
“Let me put it this way, it’s one of the most secretive organizations that infiltrates like the Communist Party…the communists used to work that way,” Fatah explained. “You’d have cells, you’d have hierarchy. You cannot take the question to the top. There are multiple levels of membership. And then you get into the inner circle. And so this is a vast fascist organization that will create bloodshed only when it suits itself.”
Fatah maintains that past examples — including The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development case — show how the Brotherhood’s code of conduct operates. The group’s goals, he maintains, are to destroy any institution where people have power over the public law.
“It’s an ideological war,” he said. “You cannot do this without having Muslims that are anti-Islamists take the lead.”
As for sharia, a complex Islamic law that serves as the basis for legislative and judicial structures in many fundamentalist Muslim countries (Click here for the BBC’s brief description on sharia), Fatah has an opinion that is certain to be unpopular among Islamists and fans of the legal structure. Not only does he dislike sharia, but he believes it is a paradigm that was never intended to exist in the Islamic faith.
“The simple question is, ‘Do you think that sharia is the source of public law where you live?.’” he asked. ”If you say ‘yes’ [that sharia has a place in public law] you’re part of the problem.”
When pressed on the issue and asked to explain what role, if any, sharia serves, Fatah was quick to answer.
“It has no place in Islam. It has to be totally rejected, because it is the law that gives dictators — it has been dictated by caliphs and sultans to justify their rule over oppressed people,” he explained. ”If Muhammed came around he wouldn’t know what this meant. If he came around, he’d say who the [heck] wrote this up?”
While many conservatives may agree with Fatah’s points on radical Islam, the chances they’ll be able to endorse his economic views are pretty low. He claims that he doesn’t “buy into this notion of cutting taxes and making America beg for money from the Chinese.”
When asked to comment on the title he’s been given by some — “liberal Marxist” — Fatah seemed hesitant to fully embrace it.
“I study Marxism primarily to study the effect of economics on the development of society. And I still believe that the economic depiction of how capitalism works by Karl Marx is quite accurate,” he said. “That doesn‘t necessarily mean I’m a communist or that has anything to do with how constitutional democracy should work. I think many of the facets of Marxism ended up in the U.S. — the 40-hour work week or the Saturday and Sunday holidays or women in the work force.”
While he explained that these latter elements may not have come from Marxism directly, he said that have roots in Fabian socialism.
Regardless of where individuals stand on the economic front, Fatah’s message about America was clear during the interview: ”Criticizing the U.S. simply because it suits for better dinner table conversation — it doesn’t help anyone.”
Malik Ali Brings the Crazy to Irvine Speech
Malik Ali Brings the Crazy to Irvine Speech
May 17, 2012
Zionists are responsible for the global financial meltdown, and President Barack Obama is a puppet for powerful white people who are gearing up for full-scale military conflict to colonize Africa.
Those kernels of wisdom were imparted by Imam Abdel Malik Ali at the University of California, Irvine last week. He spoke as part of the Muslim Student Union (MSU)'s "Palestine Liberation Week" on campus, an annual event that routinely features radical ideology and hate speech.
Malik Ali, described as a "hilarious hater" by a local newspaper, earned a reputation for "repeatedly cross[ing] the line from lambasting Israeli policy to promoting bizarre anti-Jewish conspiracy theories of the sort typically favored by neo-Nazis, as well as by giving voice to loathing for all Jews as a people."
The MSU, therefore, was well aware of what it was getting when it invited Malik Ali to speak, and he did not disappoint. He repeatedly dismissed Israel as an apartheid state, adding that any supporter of the Jewish state was inherently immoral. He derided what he saw as an American imperialism that is driven by racist power brokers and "Zionist Jews."
"The current financial crisis and collapse, the architects of it are Zionists," he told a crowd of more than 150 people. "Whether you're talking about [Alan] Greenspan or whether you're talking about [Treasury Secretary Timothy] Geithner or whether you're talking about [former White House economic adviser Lawrence [Summers] or whether you're talking about [Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd] Blankfein, or whether you're talking about [JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie] Dimon – I'm saying Zionism corrupts you, Zionism corrupts you.
"These are not righteous Jews who are doing this. These are not righteous practitioners of the Jewish faith who are doing this," he said. In fact, not all those named are Jews. But Malik Ali said they drive animosity toward Muslims in order to divert attention from their bad deeds.
"These are them who would mix injustice with their religion. And so in order for the American people not to realize that, again Islam and Muslims must be vilified."
That vilification apparently extends to the heart of the war on terror, which Malik Ali argued is made up of whole cloth.
"There's no such thing as al-Qaida," he said. "That's another okeydokey – that's another deception. There is no such thing as al-Qaida. Like no such thing as al-Qaida. No, no such thing at all."
President Obama is a mere pawn doing the bidding of powerful, colonial interests, Malik Ali said. They need a black face in power to mask their true objectives.
"Barack Obama is already in brothers and sisters, because the next theater of operations is Africa. Black Africa. That's the next theater of operations. That's why the troops are coming out of Iraq. That's why the troops are coming out of Afghanistan," he said. American forces already have been used in Somalia and Libya, and a few have been sent to Uganda.
"And check this out. They cannot have a white man in the White House bombing black Africa. You can't do it. Because if you have a white man in the White House bombing black Africa, it's gonna wake black people up all over this world ... But if a black man is doing this, a black man with a Muslim name is doing it. And then they have the US-African command, which is designed to remilitarize and recolonize Africa. The head of the US-African command is an African-American general. Be very careful of just using color."
Malik Ali first warned people not to be excited about Obama within weeks of his election. The incoming president was "a very dangerous, dangerous deception" because Jews like Rahm Emmanuel and David Axelrod were key advisers.
America's first black president, Malik Ali said last week, has proven to be a tool for racists.
"The justification for empire has always been white supremacy. We have to do this to you. It's the white man's burden. How come they sit there in Iraq? They sit there in Iraq to teach the people how to govern themselves. Iraq has been here for like 5,000 years. But they have to teach the Iraqis how to govern themselves. It's the white man's burden. See the corrupting influence of empire at the root of it is the justification for empire. And that is white supremacy."
It would be easy to dismiss Malik Ali as a crackpot. In 2010, he endorsed terrorist groups Hamas and Hizballah. Speaking at San Francisco State University months after the 9/11 attacks, he insisted that Palestinian suicide bombers are not terrorists, but heroic martyrs who make their mothers proud. "And once you go up against a people who love death, more than you love life, you in trouble man! You in serious trouble!"
It is significant, though, that the MSU – considered among the most radical chapters of the national Muslim Students Association – continues to invite him to rant at its events, while still claiming to be a serious campus organization.
A California jury convicted 10 students from Irvine and UC, Riverside of misdemeanor charges stemming from an MSU plot to silence a 2010 speech on campus by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren. Prosecutors argued that the group could not use free speech rights to deprive others of the right to speak. Internal MSU emails, obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, made it clear that the students did not want Oren to be able to complete his talk.
Its opposition to Oren's speech was rooted in a passionate opposition to Israeli actions, they say. But the consistent presence of an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist like Malik Ali at MSU events calls that motivation into question.
Still, supposedly mainstream Islamist groups and their allies hailed the students as martyrs for free speech, prosecuted solely for their faith and political beliefs. In his remarks, Malik Ali praised the "beautiful brothers" involved in the plot, saying "that what the Irvine 11 did was right, what the Irvine 11 did was righteous, what the Irvine 11 did was good, and there was nothing wrong with what the Irvine 11 did especially in the respect of being in the United States of America."
But his commitment to free speech stops when Muslims are offended.
He compared reaction to a campus incident in which the university president cited an incident in which a swastika was drawn on a Jewish student's door as an act of intolerance. But nothing was said when other students posted images that were supposed to be of the prophet Muhammad.
"How come that [swastika] shouldn't be tolerated and that is injurious and not the pictures of the prophet, peace be upon him, that they show him being disrespected? How come that wasn't put on the list? How come that wasn't cited as an act of intolerance? Why not? But no, at that time I'm told that the students the MSU were simply told that it is their right to free speech. What? Right to free speech? They have a right to put that type of information out there that is inflammatory; they have a right to do that? Okay, I see."
Muslims are convenient scapegoats for racist, colonialist powers to usurp American civil liberties and kill enemies, he said, warning, "It's gonna go beyond us and it's gonna hit other Americans."
This is protected speech, and MSU is free to choose its speakers no matter how extreme their message. It also provides compelling evidence that the MSU's judgment is driven by a hatred, not just of Israeli policy, but of Jews and others who support the state.
CAIR’s Nihad Awad, Discusses the Growing Influence of Muslims in Our Government
CAIR’s Nihad Awad,
Discusses the Growing Influence of Muslims in Our Government
Nihad Awad is a founding member and the current Executive Director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). He is also an ex-member of the Islamic Association for Palestine.
In the 1990s, Awad studied civil engineering at the University of Minnesota and worked at the University of Minnesota Medical Center. As he developed into an increasingly outspoken advocate for the rights of Palestinians, Awad was named Public Relations Director of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP), which functioned as a front for the terrorist organization Hamas. In 1994 Awad, along with Omar Ahmad and Ibrahim Hooper, founded CAIR.
Eager to gain influence with whichever political party holds power, Awad has courted Democrats and Republicans alike. During the administration of Bill Clinton in 1997, Awad was appointed to the Civil Rights Advisory Panel to the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security. And during the 2000 presidential election cycle, he figured prominently in the American Muslim Political Coordinating Committee, a network of American Islamic organizations that assisted in establishing a Muslim voting bloc which endorsed George W. Bush. In the 2006 mid-term elections, Awad contributed thousands of dollars to the campaign of Minnesota Democrat Keith Ellison, the first Muslim to be elected to the U.S. Congress.
Awad wrote in the Muslim World Monitor that the 1994 trial which resulted in the conviction of four Islamic terrorists who had perpetrated the previous year's World Trade Center bombing was “a travesty of justice.” Notwithstanding the confessions of the terrorists, Awad said: "There is ample evidence indicating that both the Mossad [Israel’s intelligence agency] and the Egyptian Intelligence played a role in the explosion."
In a 1994 interview with newsman Mike Wallace, Awad was asked if he supported the “military undertakings of Hamas,” to which he replied: “The United Nations Charter grants people who are under occupation [the right] to defend themselves against illegal occupation.” That same year, Awad declared at a Barry University meeting, "I am a supporter of the Hamas movement.”
In June 2001 Awad participated in a protest outside the State Department and the White House, condemning U.S. support for Israel’s allegedly repressive government. In conjunction with this demonstration, several organizations -- including CAIR, IAP, American Muslims for Jerusalem, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the American Muslim Council, and the Muslim American Society -- released a statement that read: “Before there can be any lasting peace in the region, America must finally come to terms with the real sources of violence, namely: 1) The brutal Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, 2) The continued expansion of settlements, 3) The denial of the right of return for Palestinian refugees, [and] 4) The billions of American taxpayer dollars that help finance Israel's occupation. Any other course of action is a recipe for unending strife and instability.”
In September 2003, Awad and CAIR Chairman Omar Ahmad were invited to testify at hearings held by the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology, and Homeland Security; both men declined to testify.
In an August 2006 interview on C-SPAN's Washington Journal, Awad suggested that suicide bombings are understandable attempts to address political injustices and do not have any inherent connection to radical Islam. Referring to the writing of political scientist Robert Pape on the topic, Awad stated: “[Pape] found out that [suicide terrorism] has more to do with occupations and fighting injustice than religion.”
Awad has been a guest speaker at numerous colleges and universities, including Harvard, Stanford, and Johns Hopkins. He was also a featured speaker at the 2002 Reuters Forum on global cooperation at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism.
Last edited by Paparock; 05-19-2012 at 02:59 PM..